Tayyab Haroon, Jamil Saima, Hashmi Shiraz
Surgery/Ophthalmology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2021 May 14;13(5):e15021. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15021.
Objectives The objective of this study is to compare various dual blade vitrectomy cutters for their efficiency in an in vitro setting. Methods In this in vitro experimental study, we compared various vitrectomy systems including EVA (Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center, Zuidland, The Netherlands), REVOLUTION (Optikon 2000, Inc., Rome, Italy), and OS4 (Oertli Instrumente AG, Berneck, Switzerland) in terms of efficiency in vitreous cutting and aspiration for various vitreous substitutes. These substitutes included water, chicken egg albumin, and goat vitreous. We only used 23-gauge dual blade cutters across all platforms to maintain uniformity. The cutting and aspiration efficiency was measured across various cut and vacuum settings of vitrectomy machines and measured as mass aspirated in a given time. Data analysis included comparing the amount of mass aspirated by these machines at preset cut and vacuum settings. Results Scatter plots showed a comparable mass of water aspirated by the EVA and REVOLUTION at 1000 to 5000 cuts per minute at a constant vacuum of 500 mm Hg whereas OS4 aspirated lesser mass at similar settings. Same trends were noted for goat vitreous for EVA and REVOLUTION but aspirated mass of albumin fluctuated widely across various platforms. At peak machine settings, REVOLUTION showed superiority across all three vitreous models due to its higher peak settings. The area under curve (AUC) analysis showed no significant differences among machines for water and goat vitreous at comparable settings but results were fluctuating for egg albumin. Conclusion Employing higher cut rates for dual blade cutters results in better efficiency of vitrectomy machines.
目的 本研究的目的是在体外环境中比较各种双刀片玻璃体切割器的效率。方法 在这项体外实验研究中,我们比较了各种玻璃体切割系统,包括EVA(荷兰眼科研究中心,荷兰南地)、REVOLUTION(Optikon 2000公司,意大利罗马)和OS4(奥尔特利仪器股份公司,瑞士贝内克)在切割和抽吸各种玻璃体替代物方面的效率。这些替代物包括水、鸡蛋白和山羊玻璃体。我们在所有平台上仅使用23号双刀片切割器以保持一致性。在玻璃体切割器的各种切割和真空设置下测量切割和抽吸效率,并以给定时间内抽吸的质量来衡量。数据分析包括比较这些机器在预设切割和真空设置下抽吸的质量量。结果 散点图显示,在500毫米汞柱的恒定真空下,EVA和REVOLUTION在每分钟1000至5000次切割时抽吸的水量相当,而OS4在类似设置下抽吸的质量较少。EVA和REVOLUTION在山羊玻璃体上也观察到相同趋势,但白蛋白的抽吸质量在不同平台上波动很大。在机器的峰值设置下,REVOLUTION在所有三种玻璃体模型中均表现出优越性,因为其峰值设置更高。曲线下面积(AUC)分析表明,在可比设置下,机器在水和山羊玻璃体方面没有显著差异,但鸡蛋白蛋白的结果波动较大。结论 对双刀片切割器采用更高的切割速率可提高玻璃体切割器的效率。