Romano Mario Rosario, Stocchino Alessandro, Ferrara Mariantonia, Lagazzo Alberto, Repetto Rodolfo
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano - Milano, Italy.
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa DICCA, Genoa, Italy.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 6;7(6):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.19. eCollection 2018 Nov.
To assess the fluidics of double-vitreous cutter blade (DB) compared with single-blade (SB) guillotine with 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge vitrectomy probes. To assess flow characteristics and flow rates in viscous and viscoelastic fluids.
We used Particle Image Velocimetry to measure the flow field close to the tip of each cutter probe and we derived kinematic quantities of interest, such as kinetic energy and acceleration. We performed measurements both on a balanced salt solution (BSS) and on a viscoelastic artificial vitreous (AV).
The flow rate is significantly higher with DB than SB vitrectomy probes, for a given pumping pressure and cutting rate. The fluid flow observed is very different between BSS and AV tests.
The DB has more efficient fluidics than SB vitrectomy probe in all tested conditions. Fluid acceleration depends on the cutting frequency, especially in the case of measurements in AV. The flow rate strongly depends on the pressure and it is little affected by the cutting frequency, in a range of clinical interest. The 27-G DB produces flow rates similar to the 23- and 25-G SB, with significantly smaller acceleration. The flow induced in the AV is different from that in BSS and oscillates at different frequencies.
DB cutters prove to be more efficient in terms of lower acceleration for a given flow rate. The latter is mainly controlled by aspiration pressure and less by cut rates. The influence of vitreous rheology deserves further investigations.
评估双玻璃体切割刀片(DB)与单刀片(SB)断头台式切割器在使用23G、25G和27G玻璃体切割探头时的流体力学特性。评估粘性和粘弹性流体中的流动特性和流速。
我们使用粒子图像测速技术测量每个切割探头尖端附近的流场,并得出感兴趣的运动学量,如动能和加速度。我们在平衡盐溶液(BSS)和粘弹性人工玻璃体(AV)上都进行了测量。
在给定的抽吸压力和切割速率下,DB玻璃体切割探头的流速明显高于SB探头。在BSS和AV测试中观察到的流体流动有很大差异。
在所有测试条件下,DB的流体力学效率均高于SB玻璃体切割探头。流体加速度取决于切割频率,尤其是在AV测量的情况下。在临床相关范围内,流速强烈依赖于压力,而受切割频率的影响较小。27G的DB产生的流速与23G和25G的SB相似,但加速度明显较小。AV中诱导的流动与BSS中的不同,且以不同频率振荡。
对于给定的流速,DB切割器在较低加速度方面表现出更高的效率。后者主要由抽吸压力控制,而受切割速率的影响较小。玻璃体流变学的影响值得进一步研究。