Ekdahl Max, Dominguez Cristián, Pinedo Miguel, López Sebastián, Gutiérrez Vicente
Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
JSES Int. 2021 Feb 24;5(3):540-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.010. eCollection 2021 May.
The purpose of this study was to identify nerves at risk when using a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis precontoured long proximal humerus locking plate and to evaluate the risk of injury to deltoid insertion and brachialis muscle.
Ten cadaveric upper limb specimens were used. A transdeltoid anterolateral approach was performed proximally and a second anterior approach was performed distally. A 14-hole "low" long precountored ALPS locking plate (Biomet Trauma; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) was used. Subsequently, anatomic dissection to measure the anatomic relationship of the plate with the deltoid insertion, with the brachialis muscle, and with the axillary, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves was performed.
The mean humeral length was 302 mm (standard deviation 52.3, 99% confidence interval: 259.3-344.6). In 6 specimens, the axillary nerve was located at the level of the third row of holes of the plate; in 3 specimens, at the level of the fourth row; and in one specimen, at the level of the second row. The distance between the plate and the musculocutaneous nerve was on average 10.2 mm (standard deviation 4, 99% confidence interval: 6.9-13.5) and between the plate and the radial nerve was on average 7.9 mm (standard deviation 4.7, 99% confidence interval: 4-11.8). The plate pierced the anterior distal fibers of the deltoid in all specimens. In 8 specimens, no brachialis muscle fibers were located under the plate.
The use of the long precontoured 14-hole ALPS locking plate with the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique, previously identifying the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves, is feasible; however, the distances between the plate and the nerves remain low, so caution should be maintained. Despite the curved design of the plate, the deltoid insertion is partially compromised in all cases.
本研究的目的是确定使用微创钢板接骨术预塑形的肱骨近端锁定长钢板时存在风险的神经,并评估三角肌止点和肱肌损伤的风险。
使用10个尸体上肢标本。近端采用经三角肌前外侧入路,远端采用第二个前入路。使用一块14孔“低”预塑形的ALPS锁定钢板(Biomet创伤;美国印第安纳州华沙市的捷迈邦美公司)。随后,进行解剖 dissection 以测量钢板与三角肌止点、肱肌以及腋神经、桡神经和肌皮神经的解剖关系。
肱骨平均长度为302毫米(标准差52.3,99%置信区间:259.3 - 344.6)。在6个标本中,腋神经位于钢板第三排孔的水平;在3个标本中,位于第四排水平;在1个标本中,位于第二排水平。钢板与肌皮神经之间的平均距离为10.2毫米(标准差4,99%置信区间:6.9 - 13.5),钢板与桡神经之间的平均距离为7.9毫米(标准差4.7,99%置信区间:4 - 11.8)。在所有标本中,钢板穿透了三角肌前远端纤维。在8个标本中,钢板下方未发现肱肌纤维。
采用微创钢板接骨术技术,预先识别腋神经和肌皮神经,使用预塑形的14孔ALPS锁定长钢板是可行的;然而,钢板与神经之间的距离仍然较小,因此应保持谨慎。尽管钢板呈弯曲设计,但在所有病例中三角肌止点均受到部分影响。