• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小学食物素养干预措施:系统范围综述。

Food Literacy Interventions in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.

机构信息

Academic associate, Medical officer, DPhil candidate, (

Lecturer in Public Health, Pharmacist, (

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2021 Aug;91(8):660-669. doi: 10.1111/josh.13053. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1111/josh.13053
PMID:34137459
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Childhood is a critical period for developing food-related skills and knowledge, known as food literacy (FL). Schools may be an important setting for interventions aiming to improve FL in children. This systematic scoping review aimed to characterize food literacy interventions in elementary schools.

METHODS

Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO) were searched for FL interventions in elementary schools (students aged 4-12 years). Studies were assessed according to design, duration, theoretical underpinning, and ascertainment of FL outcome(s). Interventions were assessed according to FL competencies (functional, interactive, and critical).

RESULTS

After exclusions, 116 studies were eligible for review, including 105 original interventions. Interventions ranged from 45 minutes to 4 years. Social cognitive theory was the most referenced theory and common interventions included; classroom lessons, games, school gardens, food preparation, and cooking classes. Most studies measured FL outcomes quantitatively (96%, N = 111). All studies addressed functional FL (N = 116), while 77% (N = 89) addressed interactive FL and 28% (N = 32) addressed critical FL.

CONCLUSIONS

This first international review of FL programs in elementary schools found great heterogeneity in school-based FL intervention design and measurement of FL. Few interventions addressed critical FL, which should be a focus for future interventions.

摘要

背景

儿童时期是发展与食物相关的技能和知识的关键时期,这被称为食品素养(FL)。学校可能是干预儿童食品素养的重要场所。本系统范围综述旨在描述小学的食品素养干预措施。

方法

在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 EBSCO 数据库中搜索小学的食品素养干预措施(年龄为 4-12 岁的学生)。根据设计、持续时间、理论基础和食品素养结果的确定来评估研究。根据食品素养能力(功能、互动和批判)评估干预措施。

结果

经过排除,有 116 项研究符合审查条件,包括 105 项原始干预措施。干预措施的持续时间从 45 分钟到 4 年不等。社会认知理论是引用最多的理论,常见的干预措施包括课堂教学、游戏、校园菜园、食品准备和烹饪课程。大多数研究从定量的角度衡量了食品素养的结果(96%,N=111)。所有研究都涉及功能食品素养(N=116),而 77%(N=89)的研究涉及互动食品素养,28%(N=32)的研究涉及批判性食品素养。

结论

这是首次对小学食品素养计划进行的国际审查,发现基于学校的食品素养干预措施设计和食品素养衡量方法存在很大的异质性。很少有干预措施涉及批判性食品素养,这应该是未来干预措施的重点。

相似文献

1
Food Literacy Interventions in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.小学食物素养干预措施:系统范围综述。
J Sch Health. 2021 Aug;91(8):660-669. doi: 10.1111/josh.13053. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Effects of school-based interventions on Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in primary-school-age children: a systematic review.基于学校的干预措施对小学适龄儿童食品与营养素养的影响:一项系统综述
Br J Nutr. 2023 Jun 28;129(12):2102-2121. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522002811. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Identifying Food Literacy Educational Opportunities for Youth.识别青少年的食物素养教育机会。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Dec;45(6):918-925. doi: 10.1177/1090198118775485. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
School-based interventions for promoting food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children: a systematic review protocol.学校为促进小学生的食物与营养素养而进行的干预措施:系统综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 22;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01339-0.
5
Promoting food literacy in primary school classrooms through the HealthLit4Kids Program in Australia.通过澳大利亚的“儿童健康素养计划”在小学课堂中提升食品素养。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Dec 1;37(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac166.
6
The impact of school-based cooking classes on vegetable intake, cooking skills and food literacy of children aged 4-12 years: A systematic review of the evidence 2001-2021.2001-2021 年基于学校的烹饪课对 4-12 岁儿童蔬菜摄入量、烹饪技能和食物素养影响的系统评价
Appetite. 2024 Apr 1;195:107238. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107238. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
A Scoping Review of Food Literacy Interventions.食品素养干预措施的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 19;16(18):3171. doi: 10.3390/nu16183171.
8
Food literacy programmes in secondary schools: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence.中学阶段的食品素养教育计划:对定量和定性证据的系统文献回顾和叙述性综合。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(15):2891-2913. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001666. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
9
Evaluation of the PhunkyFoods intervention on food literacy and cooking skills of children aged 7-9 years: a cluster randomised controlled trial in Yorkshire Primary Schools UK.英国约克郡小学儿童(7-9 岁)食物素养和烹饪技能的 PhunkyFoods 干预效果评价:一项集群随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Aug 1;23(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06558-5.
10
Effects of a School-Based Nutrition, Gardening, and Cooking Intervention on Metabolic Parameters in High-risk Youth: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于学校的营养、园艺和烹饪干预对高危青少年代谢参数的影响:一项集群随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50375.

引用本文的文献

1
Food, nutrition and sustainability education in Australian primary schools: a cross-sectional analysis of teacher perspectives and practices.澳大利亚小学的食品、营养与可持续发展教育:教师观点与实践的横断面分析
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 22;82(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01449-4.
2
A Scoping Review of Food Literacy Interventions.食品素养干预措施的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 19;16(18):3171. doi: 10.3390/nu16183171.
3
Who has a high level of food literacy, and who does not?: a qualitative study of college students in South Korea.
谁具备较高的食品素养,谁又不具备?对韩国大学生的一项定性研究
Nutr Res Pract. 2023 Dec;17(6):1155-1169. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.6.1155. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Enhancing Food Literacy and Food Security through School Gardening in Rural and Regional Communities.通过农村和地区社区的学校园艺提高粮食知识和粮食安全。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;20(18):6794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186794.
5
What Is a School Farm? Results of a Scoping Review.什么是学校农场?范围综述的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;20(7):5332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075332.
6
FOODLIT-Trial: Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Digital Intervention to Promote Food Literacy and Sustainability Behaviours in Adults Using the Health Action Process Approach and the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.FOODLIT-试验:一项随机对照数字干预方案,旨在使用健康行动过程方法和行为改变技术分类学,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,促进成年人的食品素养和可持续性行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063529.
7
How Primary School Curriculums in 11 Countries around the World Deliver Food Education and Address Food Literacy: A Policy Analysis.11 个国家的小学课程如何提供食育并解决食物素养问题:政策分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042019.
8
Developing culturally appropriate food literacy resources for Aboriginal children with Foodbank WA's Superhero Foods.为拥有食物银行西澳的超级食物的原住民儿童开发文化适宜的食品素养资源。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Oct;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):150-162. doi: 10.1002/hpja.584. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
A systematic scoping review of the literacy literature to develop a digital food and nutrition literacy model for low-income adults to make healthy choices in the online food retail ecosystem to reduce obesity risk.一项系统的文献范围综述,旨在为低收入成年人开发一个数字食品和营养素养模型,使他们能够在在线食品零售生态系统中做出健康选择,降低肥胖风险。
Obes Rev. 2022 Apr;23(4):e13414. doi: 10.1111/obr.13414. Epub 2022 Jan 29.