Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113782. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13782.
Alternative methods for hospital occupancy forecasting, essential information in hospital crisis planning, are necessary in a novel pandemic when traditional data sources such as disease testing are limited.
To determine whether mandatory daily employee symptom attestation data can be used as syndromic surveillance to estimate COVID-19 hospitalizations in the communities where employees live.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted from April 2, 2020, to November 4, 2020, at a large academic hospital network of 10 hospitals accounting for a total of 2384 beds and 136 000 discharges in New England. The participants included 6841 employees who worked on-site at hospital 1 and lived in the 10 hospitals' service areas.
Daily employee self-reported symptoms were collected using an automated text messaging system from a single hospital.
Mean absolute error (MAE) and weighted mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7-day forecasts of daily COVID-19 hospital census at each hospital.
Among 6841 employees living within the 10 hospitals' service areas, 5120 (74.8%) were female individuals and 3884 (56.8%) were White individuals; the mean (SD) age was 40.8 (13.6) years, and the mean (SD) time of service was 8.8 (10.4) years. The study model had a MAE of 6.9 patients with COVID-19 and a weighted MAPE of 1.5% for hospitalizations for the entire hospital network. The individual hospitals had an MAE that ranged from 0.9 to 4.5 patients (weighted MAPE ranged from 2.1% to 16.1%). For context, the mean network all-cause occupancy was 1286 during this period, so an error of 6.9 is only 0.5% of the network mean occupancy. Operationally, this level of error was negligible to the incident command center. At hospital 1, a doubling of the number of employees reporting symptoms (which corresponded to 4 additional employees reporting symptoms at the mean for hospital 1) was associated with a 5% increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations at hospital 1 in 7 days (regression coefficient, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.07; P < .001).
This cohort study found that a real-time employee health attestation tool used at a single hospital could be used to estimate subsequent hospitalizations in 7 days at hospitals throughout a larger hospital network in New England.
在新型大流行期间,传统的疾病检测等数据源受到限制,因此需要替代方法来预测医院入住率,这是医院危机规划的重要信息。
确定强制性的每日员工症状证明数据是否可用于综合征监测,以估计员工居住的社区中的 COVID-19 住院人数。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究于 2020 年 4 月 2 日至 2020 年 11 月 4 日在新英格兰的一个由 10 家医院组成的大型学术医院网络中进行,该网络共有 2384 张床位和 136000 张出院量。参与者包括在医院 1 现场工作并居住在 10 家医院服务区域内的 6841 名员工。
每天使用自动短信系统从一家医院收集员工自我报告的症状。
每家医院的每日 COVID-19 住院人数的 7 天预测的平均绝对误差(MAE)和加权平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)。
在居住在 10 家医院服务区域内的 6841 名员工中,5120 名(74.8%)为女性,3884 名(56.8%)为白人;平均(SD)年龄为 40.8(13.6)岁,平均(SD)服务年限为 8.8(10.4)年。研究模型的 MAE 为 6.9 例 COVID-19 患者,加权 MAPE 为整个医院网络住院率的 1.5%。各医院的 MAE 范围为 0.9 至 4.5 例(加权 MAPE 范围为 2.1%至 16.1%)。相比之下,在此期间网络总入住率为 1286,因此 6.9 的误差仅占网络平均入住率的 0.5%。从运营角度来看,这种误差水平对事件指挥中心来说可以忽略不计。在医院 1 中,报告症状的员工人数增加一倍(相当于医院 1 平均增加 4 名报告症状的员工),则与医院 1 7 天内 COVID-19 住院人数增加 5%相关(回归系数,0.05;95%置信区间,0.02-0.07;P<.001)。
这项队列研究发现,在单个医院使用的实时员工健康证明工具可用于估计新英格兰更大医院网络中其他医院 7 天后的住院人数。