O'Neal Catherine Walker, Lavner Justin A
107 Family Science Center II.
Department of Psychology.
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Feb;36(1):35-45. doi: 10.1037/fam0000894. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Consistent with the emotional cycle of deployment, postdeployment reintegration is often a time of highs and lows as service members (SMs) and their families adjust to their new normal. However, few studies have considered the nuances of reintegration, specifically the various patterns of personal and family reintegration experiences that may exist. The present study uses latent profile analysis to identify unique reintegration patterns along four dimensions (i.e., positive personal, negative personal, positive family, and negative family reintegration) for SMs ( = 236) and a subsample of their civilian partners ( = 141). Differences among the resulting reintegration profiles were also examined for demographics, military-related characteristics, psychosocial characteristics, and individual and family functioning. Three profile groups with varying reintegration experiences emerged for SMs, and two groups emerged for civilian partners. For both SMs and their civilian partners, one profile (39.0% of SMs and 63.8% of civilian partners) was characterized by high positive family and personal reintegration and low negative family and personal reintegration. Other groups reported moderate to high positive and negative family and personal reintegration. SMs and civilian partners with the most favorable reintegration profile reported greater family cohesion. For SMs, differences in sleep were also reported across the reintegration profiles, whereas, for civilian partners, differences in depressive symptoms emerged across the reintegration profiles. Few group differences emerged for demographics, military-related characteristics, and psychosocial characteristics. Findings highlight important variability in military families' experiences within the reintegration stage of the deployment cycle. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
与部署的情绪周期一致,部署后重新融入阶段往往充满起伏,因为军人及其家人要适应新的常态。然而,很少有研究考虑到重新融入的细微差别,特别是可能存在的个人和家庭重新融入经历的各种模式。本研究使用潜在剖面分析,为236名军人及其141名平民伴侣的子样本,确定在四个维度(即积极的个人、消极的个人、积极的家庭和消极的家庭重新融入)上独特的重新融入模式。还对所得重新融入剖面在人口统计学、与军事相关的特征、心理社会特征以及个人和家庭功能方面的差异进行了检验。军人出现了三个具有不同重新融入经历的剖面组,平民伴侣出现了两个组。对于军人及其平民伴侣来说,一种剖面(39.0%的军人和63.8%的平民伴侣)的特点是家庭和个人的积极重新融入程度高,家庭和个人的消极重新融入程度低。其他组报告了中等至高程度的家庭和个人的积极和消极重新融入。具有最有利重新融入剖面的军人和平民伴侣报告了更强的家庭凝聚力。对于军人来说,不同重新融入剖面的睡眠差异也有报告,而对于平民伴侣来说,不同重新融入剖面的抑郁症状差异也出现了。在人口统计学、与军事相关的特征和心理社会特征方面,几乎没有出现组间差异。研究结果突出了军事家庭在部署周期重新融入阶段经历的重要变异性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)