Smith Madison S, Jarnecke Amber M, South Susan C
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):376. doi: 10.1037/per0000505. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Reports an error in "Pathological personality, relationship satisfaction, and intimate partner aggression: Analyses using the , alternative model of personality disorder traits" by Madison S. Smith, Amber M. Jarnecke and Susan C. South (, 2020[Nov], Vol 11[6], 398-408). In the original article, there were wording errors in the Results section. In the last sentence of the "Antagonism" section under the "Actor-Partner Analyses of Satisfaction and IPA" heading, the PID-5-IRF actor effect was described as "individuals whose partners rate them as more antagonistic are more likely to perpetrate psychological IPA." However, the PID-5-IRF actor effect should have been described as "individuals who rate their partners as more antagonistic are more likely to perpetrate psychological IPA." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-26463-001). Personality disorders (PDs) have been linked to lower levels of marital satisfaction and the perpetration of intimate partner aggression (IPA). Much of this work has used self-reports of PD symptoms conceptualized via the () categorical approach. The current study adds to the literature by examining how marital satisfaction and IPA are associated with a dimensional assessment of PDs, specifically by conceptualizing PDs using the , Section III alternative model of personality disorder. By collecting data from both partners in a sample of newlywed couples, we also leverage PD trait agreement between (a) both partner's own self-reports (similarity), (b) self- and spouse report (accuracy), and (c) self and ratings of partner (perceptual similarity), to examine couple-level predictors of relationship well-being (i.e., satisfaction and psychological/physical IPA). Data were drawn from a sample of 101 newly married couples who participated in baseline and follow-up data collection over a period of 12 months. Actor-partner interdependence analyses revealed significant self-report actor and partner effects on marital satisfaction and psychological and physical IPA; for spouse report, actor effects were more consistent than partner reports. Agreement was moderate for both similarity and accuracy, but greater agreement was related to greater relationship satisfaction, particularly at later time points. Thus, although reports of elevated personality pathology are detrimental to marital functioning, spousal agreement may protect against these effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
麦迪逊·S·史密斯、安伯·M·雅内克和苏珊·C·索思于2020年11月发表在《第11卷第6期，398 - 408页》的“病理性人格、关系满意度与亲密伴侣攻击行为：使用人格障碍特质替代模型的分析”一文存在错误。在原文中，结果部分存在措辞错误。在“满意度与亲密伴侣攻击行为的行为者-伴侣分析”标题下“敌对性”部分的最后一句话中，PID - 5 - IRF行为者效应被描述为“其伴侣将他们评价为更具敌对性的个体更有可能实施心理性亲密伴侣攻击行为”。然而，PID - 5 - IRF行为者效应应被描述为“将其伴侣评价为更具敌对性的个体更有可能实施心理性亲密伴侣攻击行为”。本文的网络版本已得到更正。（以下是原始文章的摘要，记录于2020 - 26463 - 001）。人格障碍（PDs）与较低的婚姻满意度以及亲密伴侣攻击行为（IPA）的实施有关。这项工作大多使用通过（）分类方法概念化的人格障碍症状的自我报告。当前的研究通过考察婚姻满意度和亲密伴侣攻击行为如何与人格障碍的维度评估相关联来补充文献，具体而言是通过使用人格障碍第III节替代模型来概念化人格障碍。通过从新婚夫妇样本中的双方收集数据，我们还利用了（a）双方自己的自我报告之间（相似性）、（b）自我报告与配偶报告之间（准确性）以及（c）自我报告与对伴侣的评价之间（感知相似性）的人格障碍特质一致性，来考察关系幸福感（即满意度以及心理/身体亲密伴侣攻击行为）的夫妻层面预测因素。数据来自101对新婚夫妇的样本，他们在12个月的时间里参与了基线和随访数据收集。行为者-伴侣相互依赖分析揭示了自我报告的行为者和伴侣效应在婚姻满意度以及心理和身体亲密伴侣攻击行为方面具有显著性；对于配偶报告，行为者效应比伴侣报告更一致。相似性和准确性方面的一致性适中，但更高的一致性与更高的关系满意度相关，特别是在后期时间点。因此，尽管人格病理学水平升高的报告对婚姻功能有害，但配偶之间的一致性可能会抵御这些影响。（《心理学文摘数据库记录》（c）2021美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
