Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253466. eCollection 2021.
Reports of disparities in COVID-19 mortality rates are emerging in the public health literature as the pandemic continues to unfold. Alcohol misuse varies across the US and is related to poorer health and comorbidities that likely affect the severity of COVID-19 infection. High levels of pre-pandemic alcohol misuse in some counties may have set the stage for worse COVID-19 outcomes. Furthermore, this relationship may depend on how rural a county is, as access to healthcare in rural communities has lagged behind more urban areas. The objective of this study was to test for associations between county-level COVID-19 mortality, pre-pandemic county-level excessive drinking, and county rurality.
We used national COVID-19 data from the New York Times to calculate county-level case fatality rates (n = 3,039 counties and county equivalents; October 1 -December 31, 2020) and other external county-level data sources for indicators of rurality and health. We used beta regression to model case fatality rates, adjusted for several county-level population characteristics. We included a multilevel component to our model and defined state as a random intercept. Our focal predictor was a single variable representing nine possible combinations of low/mid/high alcohol misuse and low/mid/high rurality.
The median county-level COVID-19 case fatality rate was 1.57%. Compared to counties with low alcohol misuse and low rurality (referent), counties with high levels of alcohol and mid (β = -0.17, p = 0.008) or high levels of rurality (β = -0.24, p<0.001) demonstrated significantly lower case fatality rates.
Our findings highlight the intersecting roles of county-level alcohol consumption, rurality, and COVID-19 mortality.
随着大流行的持续发展,公共卫生文献中不断出现 COVID-19 死亡率差异的报告。美国各地的酒精滥用情况各不相同,与健康状况较差和合并症有关,这些因素可能会影响 COVID-19 感染的严重程度。一些县在大流行前酒精滥用水平较高,可能为 COVID-19 结局恶化埋下了伏笔。此外,这种关系可能取决于该县的农村程度,因为农村社区的医疗保健服务一直落后于更多的城市地区。本研究的目的是检验县 COVID-19 死亡率、大流行前县饮酒过量和县农村程度之间的关联。
我们使用《纽约时报》的全国 COVID-19 数据来计算县 COVID-19 死亡率(n = 3039 个县和县级当量;2020 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)以及其他外部县水平数据来源,用于衡量农村程度和健康的指标。我们使用贝塔回归来对模型进行死亡率调整,调整了几个县人口特征。我们在模型中包含了一个多层次成分,并将州定义为随机截距。我们的焦点预测因子是一个单一变量,代表低/中/高酒精滥用和低/中/高农村程度的九种可能组合。
县 COVID-19 死亡率的中位数为 1.57%。与低酒精滥用和低农村程度的县(参照)相比,高酒精水平和中等(β = -0.17,p = 0.008)或高农村程度(β = -0.24,p < 0.001)的县死亡率显著降低。
我们的研究结果强调了县饮酒水平、农村程度和 COVID-19 死亡率的交叉作用。