Park Seung-Hyun, Song Young Woo, Cha Jae-Kook, Lee Jung-Seok, Kim Young-Taek, Shin Hyun-Seung, Lee Dong-Won, Lee Jae Hyun, Kim Chang-Sung
Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Aug;23(4):543-554. doi: 10.1111/cid.13006. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits of local antibiotics as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis have been widely reported, but most studies evaluated incipient peri-implantitis lesions, and showed incomplete treatment success rates. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and microbiological outcomes of administering metronidazole in combination with minocycline as a local adjunct to the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighteen subjects with peri-implantitis were recruited in a four-center, three-arm, and 12-week randomized controlled trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: (a) MM-mechanical debridement + metronidazole-minocycline ointment, (b) MC-mechanical debridement + minocycline ointment, (c) NST-mechanical debridement only. RESULTS: Except for four subjects who was excluded during the trial, a total of 114 patients with 114 implants (one implant per each patient) finally completed the trial and were included in the analyses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the treatment success rates (absence of bleeding or suppuration on probing, and sites showing pocket probing depth [PPD] ≥5 mm) on at 12 weeks were higher in MM-group patients (31.6%) and MC-group patients (20.5%) compared to NST-group patients (2.7%; p = 0.011 and 0.040, respectively). Subjects with deepest PPD ≥8 mm showed a significant difference in the PPD reduction between MM and MC groups at week 4 (p = 0.025) and week 12 (p = 0.047). Detection ratio of Tannerella forsythia was significantly lower for MM group than MC group (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Additive use of either MM or MC results in significantly higher treatment success rates compared to sole mechanical debridement in nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Moreover, MM contributes to a significantly greater reduction in the PPD compared to MC in deep pockets (cris.nih.go.kr KCT0004557).
背景:局部使用抗生素作为种植体周围炎非手术治疗辅助手段的临床益处已被广泛报道,但大多数研究评估的是早期种植体周围炎病变,且治疗成功率不完全。 目的:评估甲硝唑联合米诺环素作为局部辅助手段用于种植体周围炎非手术治疗的临床和微生物学效果。 材料与方法:118例种植体周围炎患者被纳入一项四中心、三臂、为期12周的随机对照试验。患者被随机分配接受以下治疗之一:(a)MM组——机械清创+甲硝唑-米诺环素软膏;(b)MC组——机械清创+米诺环素软膏;(c)NST组——仅机械清创。 结果:除4例在试验期间被排除的患者外,共有114例患者(每人1枚种植体)最终完成试验并纳入分析。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与NST组患者(2.7%)相比,MM组患者(31.6%)和MC组患者(20.5%)在12周时的治疗成功率(探诊时无出血或化脓,且探诊深度[PPD]≥5 mm的部位)更高(p分别为0.011和0.040)。PPD最深≥8 mm的患者在第4周(p = 0.025)和第12周(p = 0.047)时,MM组和MC组在PPD降低方面存在显著差异。MM组福赛坦纳菌的检出率显著低于MC组(p = 0.038)。 结论:在种植体周围炎的非手术治疗中,与单纯机械清创相比,联合使用MM或MC可显著提高治疗成功率。此外,在深牙周袋中,与MC相比,MM能使PPD显著降低更多(cris.nih.go.kr KCT0004557)。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025-8
Am J Transl Res. 2024-12-15
Bioinformation. 2023-12-31
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024-10