Liu Yi, Bi Taiyong, Kuang Qijie, Zhang Bei, Wu Huawang, Li Haijing, Zhang Bin, Zhao Jingping, Ning Yuping, She Shenglin, Zheng Yingjun
Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510370, People's Republic of China.
Centre for Mental Health Research in School of Management, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000, People's Republic of China.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Jun 10;17:1893-1906. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S302584. eCollection 2021.
Impaired face perception is considered as a hallmark of social disability in schizophrenia. It is widely believed that inverted faces and upright faces are processed by distinct mechanisms. Previous studies have identified that individuals with schizophrenia display poorer face processing than controls. However, the mechanisms underlying the face inversion effect (FIE) in patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FSZ) remain unclear.
We designed an fMRI task to investigate the FIE mechanism in patients with schizophrenia. Thirty-four patients with FSZ and thirty-five healthy controls (CON) underwent task-related fMRI scanning, clinical assessment, anhedonia experience examination, and social function and cognitive function evaluation.
The patients with FSZ exhibited distinct functional activity regarding upright and inverted face processing within the cortical face and non-face network. These results suggest that the differences in quantitative processing might mediate the FIE in schizophrenia. Compared with controls, affected patients showed impairments in processing both upright and inverted faces; and for these patients with FSZ, upright face processing was associated with more severe and broader impairment than inverted face processing. Reduced response in the left middle occipital gyrus for upright face processing was related to poorer performance of social function outcomes evaluated using the Personal and Social Performance Scale.
Our data suggested that patients with FSZ exhibited similar performance in processing inverted faces and upright faces, but were less efficient than controls; and for these patients, inverted faces are processed less efficiently than upright faces. We also provided a clue that the mechanism under abnormal FIE might be related to an aberrant activation of non-face-selective areas instead of abnormal activation of face-specific areas in patients with schizophrenia. Finally, our study indicated that the neural pathway for upright recognition might be relevant in determining the functional outcomes of this devastating disorder.
面部感知受损被认为是精神分裂症社会功能障碍的一个标志。人们普遍认为,倒置面孔和正立面孔是通过不同机制进行加工的。先前的研究已经确定,精神分裂症患者的面部加工能力比对照组差。然而,首发精神分裂症(FSZ)患者面部倒置效应(FIE)背后的机制仍不清楚。
我们设计了一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)任务来研究精神分裂症患者的FIE机制。34例FSZ患者和35名健康对照者(CON)接受了与任务相关的fMRI扫描、临床评估、快感缺失体验检查以及社会功能和认知功能评估。
FSZ患者在皮质面部和非面部网络中,对于正立和倒置面孔加工表现出不同的功能活动。这些结果表明,定量加工的差异可能介导了精神分裂症中的FIE。与对照组相比,患病患者在正立和倒置面孔加工方面均表现出损伤;对于这些FSZ患者,正立面孔加工比倒置面孔加工与更严重、更广泛的损伤相关。正立面孔加工时左侧枕中回反应减弱与使用个人和社会表现量表评估的社会功能结果较差有关。
我们的数据表明,FSZ患者在倒置面孔和正立面孔加工方面表现出相似的表现,但效率低于对照组;对于这些患者,倒置面孔的加工效率低于正立面孔。我们还提供了一条线索,即精神分裂症患者异常FIE背后的机制可能与非面孔选择性区域的异常激活有关,而非面孔特异性区域的异常激活。最后,我们的研究表明,正立识别的神经通路可能与确定这种破坏性疾病的功能结果有关。