• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞利尼索、硼替佐米及地塞米松治疗既往治疗过的多发性骨髓瘤的美国预算影响模型

US Budget Impact Model for Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.

作者信息

Dolph Mike, Tremblay Gabriel, Leong Hoyee

机构信息

Health Economics Department, Purple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, 02459, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun 10;13:493-502. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S305830. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S305830
PMID:34140789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8203300/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the budget impact of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) from the perspective of a private third-party payer and Medicare in the US.

METHODS

The introduction of XVd as an option for patients with previously treated MM compared to no introduction of XVd was considered from a private third-party US payer (with 1,000,000 members) and a Medicare perspective in one-year increments for 3 years. Total annual treatment costs were calculated as the sum of drug costs, costs of treating serious treatment emergent adverse events (grade ≥3), ongoing best supportive care costs, and mortality costs.

RESULTS

The absolute budget impact (Millions, USD) of including XVd from a private third-party payer plan perspective was $0.06, $0.07, $0.08 and $0.22 for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. The relative budget impact of including XVd was 0.33%, 0.40%, 0.43%, and 0.38% for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. This translated to a per member per month (PMPM) budget impact of $0.005, $0.006, $0.007, and $0.006 (USD), for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. From a Medicare perspective, the absolute budget impact (Millions, USD) of including XVd was $29.68, $36.62, $39.42 and $105.72 for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. The relative budget impact of including XVd was 0.33%, 0.40%, 0.43%, and 0.38% percent for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. This translated to a PMPM budget impact of $0.041, $0.051, $0.054, and $0.049 (USD), for years 1, 2, 3, and overall, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed general consistency with the base-case findings.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the potential budget impact of new therapies in MM is vital for payers to manage spending and assess treatment value. The introduction of XVd presents a manageable budget impact for a third-party US payer and Medicare.

摘要

目的

从美国私人第三方支付方和医疗保险的角度,评估塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松(XVd)对既往治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的预算影响。

方法

从美国私人第三方支付方(拥有100万会员)和医疗保险的角度,以3年为期逐年考虑引入XVd作为既往治疗MM患者的一种选择与不引入XVd的情况。年度总治疗成本计算为药物成本、治疗严重治疗突发不良事件(≥3级)的成本、持续的最佳支持治疗成本和死亡成本之和。

结果

从私人第三方支付方计划的角度来看,第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的XVd纳入绝对预算影响(百万美元)分别为0.06、0.07、0.08和0.22。第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的XVd纳入相对预算影响分别为0.33%、0.40%、0.43%和0.38%。这转化为第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的每月每位会员(PMPM)预算影响分别为0.005美元、0.006美元、0.007美元和0.006美元。从医疗保险的角度来看,第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的XVd纳入绝对预算影响(百万美元)分别为29.68、36.62、39.42和105.72。第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的XVd纳入相对预算影响分别为0.33%、0.40%、0.43%和0.38%。这转化为第1年、第2年、第3年及总体的PMPM预算影响分别为0.041美元、0.051美元、0.054美元和0.049美元。敏感性分析显示与基础案例结果总体一致。

结论

了解MM新疗法的潜在预算影响对于支付方管理支出和评估治疗价值至关重要。XVd的引入对美国第三方支付方和医疗保险来说,预算影响是可控的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617d/8203300/1ae9ce2666a4/CEOR-13-493-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617d/8203300/11a43536516a/CEOR-13-493-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617d/8203300/1ae9ce2666a4/CEOR-13-493-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617d/8203300/11a43536516a/CEOR-13-493-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617d/8203300/1ae9ce2666a4/CEOR-13-493-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
US Budget Impact Model for Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.塞利尼索、硼替佐米及地塞米松治疗既往治疗过的多发性骨髓瘤的美国预算影响模型
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun 10;13:493-502. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S305830. eCollection 2021.
2
US Budget Impact Model for Selinexor in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.塞利尼索用于复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的美国预算影响模型
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun 19;12:317-325. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S251070. eCollection 2020.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Triplet Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (XVd) in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Based on Results from the Phase III BOSTON Trial.基于 III 期 BOSTON 试验结果,三药联合塞利昔布-硼替佐米-地塞米松(XVd)在既往治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1309-1325. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01068-9. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Network Meta-Analysis of Once Weekly Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.塞利尼索-硼替佐米-地塞米松每周一次方案用于既往治疗过的多发性骨髓瘤的网状Meta分析
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug 25;8(2):26-35. doi: 10.36469/001c.27080. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of prior treatments on selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma.先前治疗对既往治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者使用塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松的影响。
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Apr 13;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01071-9.
6
Estimating the Economic Impact of Adding Panobinostat to a U.S. Formulary for Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Model.评估泛昔洛韦加入美国复发性和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤处方集的经济影响:预算影响和成本效益模型。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):991-1002. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.991.
7
Budget Impact of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf) Adoption in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.在美国,采用贝利司他单抗(Belamaf)治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的预算影响
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Sep 10;13:789-800. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S310619. eCollection 2021.
8
Budget impact of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer from a third-party US payer perspective.从第三方美国支付者的角度来看,多塔利单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇治疗原发性晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌的预算影响。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1212-1221. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2403278. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
9
Selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: Outcomes by cytogenetic risk.塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松与硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗既往多发性骨髓瘤:细胞遗传学风险的结果。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1120-1130. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26261. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Budget impact analysis of introducing fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and biologics in the United States from the payer perspective.从支付方角度出发,对美国转移性结直肠癌患者氟嘧啶类、奥沙利铂类和伊立替康类化疗药物和生物制剂治疗后,引入呋喹替尼的预算影响分析。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1076-1085. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2389005. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies involving novel agents for first/second-relapse patients with multiple myeloma: a Markov model approach with calibration techniques.多发性骨髓瘤首次/二次复发患者使用新型药物联合治疗的成本效益分析:一种采用校准技术的马尔可夫模型方法
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00611-0.
2
Selinexor: Targeting a novel pathway in multiple myeloma.塞利尼索:靶向多发性骨髓瘤的一条新途径。
EJHaem. 2023 May 15;4(3):792-810. doi: 10.1002/jha2.709. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripheral neuropathy symptoms, pain, and functioning in previously treated multiple myeloma patients treated with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone.接受塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗的既往接受过治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的周围神经病变症状、疼痛及功能情况。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Oct 1;96(10):E383-E386. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26282. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Cost-effectiveness of once-weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.每周一次塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的成本效益。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Nov;62(11):2777-2784. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1933477. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
3
The American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures: 2020 Edition.
美国癌症协会《2020年事实与数据》版
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Mar;11(2):135-136. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.2.1. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
4
Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.每周一次塞利尼索、硼替佐米和地塞米松与每周两次硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者(BOSTON):一项随机、开放标签、3 期试验。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1563-1573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32292-3.
5
US Budget Impact Model for Selinexor in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.塞利尼索用于复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的美国预算影响模型
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun 19;12:317-325. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S251070. eCollection 2020.
6
Pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma after lenalidomide treatment.来那度胺治疗后复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者采用泊马度胺、地塞米松和达雷妥尤单抗治疗。
Leukemia. 2020 Dec;34(12):3286-3297. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0813-1. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial.达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松用于适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤:GRIFFIN 试验。
Blood. 2020 Aug 20;136(8):936-945. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005288.
8
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: rationale for targeting and current therapeutic approaches.B 细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用:靶向治疗的原理和当前的治疗方法。
Leukemia. 2020 Apr;34(4):985-1005. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0734-z. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.依沙佐米联合泊马度胺和低剂量地塞米松与泊马度胺和低剂量地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(ICARIA-MM):一项随机、多中心、开放性、3 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Patient-Reported Factors in Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者治疗满意度的患者报告因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):1479-1487. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0724. Epub 2019 Aug 1.