Lowry Ruth G, Hale Beverley J, Draper Stephen B, Smith Marcus S
Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, UK.
Hartpury College University Learning Centre, Gloucester, UK.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2018 Feb 6;65(3):152-161. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2018.1429041.
Drumming may have therapeutic and learning benefits but there exists little causal evidence regarding the benefits for children with emotional and behavioral difficulties (EBD) such as Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Six EBD pupils (EBD Drum) and six peers (Peer Drum) were given 2, 30-min rock drumming lessons per week, over 5 weeks. Six matched individuals received no drumming instruction (3 = EBD Control; 3 = Peer Control). An exploratory, mixed-methods analysis was used to explore quantitative changes in skills and qualitative perspectives of the teaching staff. All pupils were tested two times (pretest and posttest) on drumming ability and Motor skills (Movement Assessment Battery for Children, version 2). Teacher's rating of social behavior (Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire; SDQ) was tested two times (pretest and retention). Significant differences in total SDQ difficulties between the four groups (χ2(3) = 8.210, p = 0.042) and the hyperactivity subscale (χ2(3) = 10.641, p = 0.014) were observed. The EBD Drum group had greater reductions in total difficulties compared to the Peer Drum (p = 0.009) group and specifically greater reductions in hyperactivity compared to Peer Drum (p = 0.046) and the EBD Control (p = 0.006) group. In follow-up interviews, staff spoke positively about changes in pupil's attitudes toward learning and social confidence. The positive changes to social and behavioral skills reported in this pilot study are similar to those recorded for other music modalities.
击鼓可能具有治疗和学习方面的益处,但对于患有情绪和行为障碍(EBD)的儿童,如自闭症谱系障碍,几乎没有因果证据证明其益处。六名患有EBD的学生(EBD鼓组)和六名同龄人(同龄人鼓组)每周接受两次、每次30分钟的摇滚击鼓课程,为期5周。六名匹配的个体未接受击鼓指导(3名 = EBD对照组;3名 = 同龄人对照组)。采用探索性混合方法分析来探究技能的定量变化以及教师的定性观点。所有学生在击鼓能力和运动技能(儿童运动评估量表第2版)方面接受了两次测试(预测试和后测试)。教师对社会行为的评分(优势与困难问卷;SDQ)进行了两次测试(预测试和随访)。观察到四组之间在SDQ总困难方面存在显著差异(χ2(3) = 8.210,p = 0.042)以及多动分量表方面存在显著差异(χ2(3) = 10.641,p = 0.014)。与同龄人鼓组相比,EBD鼓组在总困难方面的降低幅度更大(p = 0.009),特别是在多动方面与同龄人鼓组相比降低幅度更大(p = 0.046),与EBD对照组相比降低幅度更大(p = 0.006)。在后续访谈中,工作人员积极谈论了学生在学习态度和社交信心方面的变化。这项初步研究中报告的社交和行为技能的积极变化与其他音乐形式所记录的变化相似。