From the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2021 Aug;19(8):842-848. doi: 10.6002/ect.2020.0544. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions are currently used for pancreas graft preservation. Our hypothesis was whether the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution is associated with worse pancreas graft survival than University of Wisconsin solution, in general and after prolonged cold ischemic time of ≥12 hours.
This retrospective study investigated the impact of static cold storage in histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (n = 133) versus University of Wisconsin (n = 107) solution on outcomes of 240 pancreas transplant procedures. Patient and graft survival rates were compared after 1, 3, and 5 years in both groups. Serum lipase, amylase, and C-reactive protein levels and incidence of surgical complications were evaluated at postoperative week 1. A subgroup analysis of 96 grafts (52 with histidine-tryptophanketoglutarate/44 with University of Wisconsin) with pancreas graft cold ischemic time ≥12 hours was also performed.
At mean follow-up of 75.2 ± 9.9 months, both groups demonstrated comparable short- and long-term patient survival. Overall, pancreas graft survival was slightly better in the histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate group (Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank P = .013). However, the subgroup analysis of grafts with cold ischemic time ≥12 hours showed slightly better pancreatic graft survival in the University of Wisconsin group, although not significantly (log-rank P = .95). Serum lipase and C-reactive protein levels at postoperative week 1 were higher in the histidinetryptophan-ketoglutarate group. Surgical complications were comparable. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified neither solution as a risk factor affecting patient and graft survival.
Although a direct comparison between histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin showed better pancreas graft survival with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate, the multivariable analysis showed that the perfusion solution does not significantly influence patient and graft survival. However, in the analysis of transplants with cold ischemic time ≥12 hours, pancreas graft survival was slightly better in the University of Wisconsin group, although not significantly.
组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸和威斯康星大学溶液目前用于胰腺移植物保存。我们的假设是,在一般情况下以及冷缺血时间≥12 小时后,使用组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸溶液是否与威斯康星大学溶液相比,与胰腺移植物存活率降低有关。
这项回顾性研究调查了在组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸(n=133)与威斯康星大学(n=107)溶液中进行静态冷储存对 240 例胰腺移植手术结果的影响。在两组中,分别在术后第 1、3 和 5 年比较患者和移植物的存活率。在术后第 1 周评估血清脂肪酶、淀粉酶和 C 反应蛋白水平以及手术并发症的发生率。还对冷缺血时间≥12 小时的 96 个移植物(52 个组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸/44 个威斯康星大学)的亚组进行了分析。
在平均 75.2±9.9 个月的随访中,两组的短期和长期患者存活率均相似。总体而言,组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸组的胰腺移植物存活率略高(Kaplan-Meier 分析,对数秩 P=0.013)。然而,冷缺血时间≥12 小时的移植物亚组分析显示,威斯康星大学组的胰腺移植物存活率略高,但无统计学意义(对数秩 P=0.95)。术后第 1 周时,组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸组的血清脂肪酶和 C 反应蛋白水平较高。手术并发症相似。多变量 Cox 回归分析未发现任何一种溶液是影响患者和移植物存活率的危险因素。
尽管组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸与威斯康星大学溶液之间的直接比较显示组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸组的胰腺移植物存活率较高,但多变量分析显示,灌注溶液对患者和移植物存活率无显著影响。然而,在冷缺血时间≥12 小时的移植分析中,威斯康星大学组的胰腺移植物存活率略高,但无统计学意义。