Division of Metabolomics, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; GL Sciences Inc., 237-2 Sayamagahara, Iruma, Saitama 358-0032, Japan.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels B-1050, Belgium.
J Chromatogr A. 2021 Aug 16;1651:462282. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462282. Epub 2021 May 26.
We report on the possibility to enhance the phase ratio and retention factor in silica monoliths. According to pioneering work done by Núñez et al. [1], this enhancement is pursued by applying a stationary phase layer via radical polymerization with octadecyl methacrylate (ODM) as an alternative to the customary octadecylsilylation (C18-derivatization). The difference in band broadening, retention factor and separation selectivity between both approaches was compared. Different hydrothermal treatment temperatures for the column preparation were applied to produce monolithic silica structures with three different mesopore sizes (resp. 10, 13, and 16 nm, as determined by argon physisorption) while maintaining similar domain size (sum of through-pore and skeleton size). It has been found that the columns with the poly(octadecyl methacrylate)-phase (ODM columns) provided a 60 to 80% higher retention factor in methanol-water mixture compared to the octadecylsilylated (ODS) columns produced by starting from similar silica backbone structures. In acetonitrile-water mixture, the enhancement is smaller (15 to 30% times higher), yet significant. By adjusting the fabrication conditions (for both the preparation of the monolithic backbones and the surface functionalization), the achieved retention factors (up k = 4.89 for pentylbenzene in 80:20% (v/v) methanol/water) are obviously higher than obtained in the pioneering study on ODM monoliths of Núñez et al. [1], and column clogging could be completely avoided. In addition, also separation efficiencies were significantly higher than shown in Ref. [1], with plate heights as low as 5.8 μm. These plate heights are however inferior to those observed on the ODS-modified sister columns. The difference can be explained by the slower intra-skeleton diffusion displayed by the ODM-modified columns, in turn caused by the larger obstruction to diffusion originating from the thicker stationary phase layer.
我们报告了在硅胶整体柱中提高相比率和保留因子的可能性。根据 Núñez 等人的开创性工作[1],通过用十八烷基甲基丙烯酸酯(ODM)进行自由基聚合来应用固定相层,而不是惯用的十八烷基硅烷化(C18 衍生化),可以实现这种增强。比较了两种方法在峰展宽、保留因子和分离选择性方面的差异。为了制备具有三种不同介孔尺寸(分别通过氩气物理吸附确定为 10、13 和 16nm)的整体硅胶结构,应用了不同的水热处理温度,同时保持相似的孔尺寸(贯穿孔和骨架尺寸之和)。结果发现,与由相似硅胶骨架结构起始制备的十八烷基硅烷化(ODS)柱相比,聚(十八烷基甲基丙烯酸酯)相(ODM 柱)在甲醇-水混合物中的保留因子提高了 60%至 80%。在乙腈-水混合物中,增强幅度较小(提高 15%至 30%),但仍然显著。通过调整制备条件(整体骨架的制备和表面功能化),所获得的保留因子(在 80:20%(v/v)甲醇/水中对戊基苯的 k 值高达 4.89)明显高于 Núñez 等人对 ODM 整体柱的开创性研究中获得的值[1],并且可以完全避免柱堵塞。此外,分离效率也明显高于 Ref. [1]中的值,塔板高度低至 5.8μm。然而,这些塔板高度不如在 ODS 修饰的姊妹柱上观察到的那么低。这种差异可以通过 ODM 修饰柱显示出较慢的骨架内扩散来解释,这反过来又是由较厚的固定相层引起的扩散阻碍造成的。