Comparison of the effects of pindolol and atenolol on hemodynamic function in systemic hypertension.

A randomized double-blind study was performed on a group of mild hypertensive patients (WHO class I) to compare the hemodynamic effects of pindolol and atenolol. Blood pressure (BP) was monitored with a mercury gauge sphygmomanometer, while cardiac function and peripheral arterial flows were measured by the noninvasive technique of bioelectric impedance. After a 2-week washout period, patients with a diastolic BP greater than 95 mm Hg but less than 114 mm Hg were randomized into the pindolol (29 patients) or atenolol (28) treatment groups. Patients were treated with 1 of the 2 drugs in an incremental fashion for 12 weeks. Cardiovascular function was measured after the washout period and at the end of the 12-week treatment period. Baseline hemodynamics were similar in both groups. The 2 drugs were equally effective in lowering both systolic and diastolic BP. Hemodynamically, pindolol lowered BP by decreasing total peripheral resistance (-406 +/- 145 dynes.s.cm-5) while atenolol decreased cardiac index (-0.2 +/- 0.1 liters/min/m2) associated with a decrease in heart rate (-12 +/- 2 beats/min). Regarding peripheral vascular beds, pindolol lowered arm vascular resistance (-198 +/- 72 mm Hg/liter/min) and leg vascular resistance (-73 +/- 25 mm Hg/liter/min), especially when subjects who did not respond to pindolol were excluded from the analysis. Both arm (5.5 +/- 5.4% increase above baseline) and leg (1.2 +/- 4.4% increase above baseline) arterial flow indexes were maintained with pindolol. Conversely, atenolol decreased the arm arterial flow index (-9,8 +/- 5.6% decrease below baseline), but not significantly and with no change in resistance (+54 +/- 62 mm Hg/liter/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)