Moriyama Nobuaki, Morita Tomohiro, Nishikawa Yoshitaka, Kobashi Yurie, Murakami Michio, Ozaki Akihiko, Nonaka Saori, Sawano Toyoaki, Oikawa Tomoyoshi, Tsubokura Masaharu
Department of Public Health, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan;23(1):111-116.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.030. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
A previous report indicated that evacuation owing to the government order after the Fukushima disaster impacted the health status of older people; however, the association between living in evacuation areas and independence in their daily lives was unclear. This study examined the hypothesis that people who were forced to evacuate their homes were more likely to need long-term care (LTC).
Historical cohort study.
Older individuals (n = 13,934) in Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, part of which was designated as an evacuation area.
Background and certification data from April 2012 to December 2016 were extracted. Logistic regression analysis with sex stratification was performed to examine the association between certification of care levels 1-5 and living in evacuation areas.
In total, 18,178 Minamisoma residents aged ≥65 years who had not received LTC certification as of March 11, 2011, were eligible for follow-up. Of these, 4244 residents without a certificate of residence by June 1, 2016, were excluded. Of 13,934 residents followed up, 1553 (11.1%) were newly certified as care levels 1-5. Certification of care levels 1-5 was associated with living in evacuation areas [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.18] and living alone at the time of the disaster (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.92-3.47) in men and living alone at the time of the disaster (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15-1.59) in women.
Living in evacuation areas and living alone were associated with LTC certification. In evacuation areas, individuals with family members were more likely to be certified compared with those in nonevacuation areas. Among residents in evacuation areas, several individuals with family members experiencing family structure changes might need LTC. Preventive measures (including group relocation) may be beneficial for those being evacuated following a disaster.
先前的一份报告表明,福岛灾难后因政府命令进行疏散对老年人的健康状况产生了影响;然而,居住在疏散区与日常生活自理能力之间的关联尚不清楚。本研究检验了被迫撤离家园的人更有可能需要长期护理(LTC)这一假设。
历史性队列研究。
日本福岛县南相马市的老年人(n = 13934),该市部分地区被指定为疏散区。
提取2012年4月至2016年12月的背景和认证数据。进行按性别分层的逻辑回归分析,以检验1 - 5级护理认证与居住在疏散区之间的关联。
截至2011年3月11日,共有18178名年龄≥65岁、未获得长期护理认证的南相马市居民符合随访条件。其中,2016年6月1日没有居住证明的4244名居民被排除。在随访的13934名居民中,1553人(11.1%)新被认证为1 - 5级护理。1 - 5级护理认证与居住在疏散区相关(优势比[OR] 1.61,95%置信区间[CI] 1.20 - 2.18),男性在灾难发生时独居(OR 2.58,95% CI 1.92 - 3.47),女性在灾难发生时独居(OR 1.35,95% CI 1.15 - 1.59)。
居住在疏散区和独居与长期护理认证相关。在疏散区,有家庭成员的个体比非疏散区的个体更有可能获得认证。在疏散区居民中,一些家庭结构发生变化的有家庭成员的个体可能需要长期护理。预防措施(包括集体搬迁)可能对灾难后撤离的人员有益。