Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Neonatal Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Oct;66:103092. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103092. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to mitigate the harmful effects of moral distress experienced by nursing and medical clinicians working in the intensive care setting.
Eligible studies were identified from searches of PubMed, EBSCO (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and Medline) and Scopus. Included studies were published prior to 20 August 2020.
Twelve studies were included in this review comprising three randomised controlled trials, seven quasi-randomised trials and two observational studies. Nine studies reported interventions targeting only nurses while three included both nurses and doctors. The types of interventions identified included: moral empowerment programs, end-of-life educational programs, reflective exercises through individual narrative writing or group reflective debriefing, multidisciplinary case debriefing meetings integrated into clinical practice and moral resiliency training. Due to the overall low methodological quality and high risk of bias, no single intervention may be considered efficacious in managing moral distress.
There is weak evidence that some currently available interventions reduce the moral distress experienced by intensive care health care providers. Larger randomised trials involving all intensive healthcare clinicians are required to evaluate multifaceted interventions.
评估干预措施在减轻重症监护环境中护理和医疗临床医生所经历的道德困境的有害影响方面的效果。
从 PubMed、EBSCO(学术搜索全面、CINAHL 和 Medline)和 Scopus 中搜索确定了合格的研究。纳入的研究发表于 2020 年 8 月 20 日之前。
本综述纳入了 12 项研究,包括 3 项随机对照试验、7 项准随机试验和 2 项观察性研究。9 项研究报告的干预措施仅针对护士,3 项研究则同时包括护士和医生。确定的干预措施类型包括:道德赋权计划、临终教育计划、通过个体叙事写作或小组反思性讨论进行的反思练习、整合到临床实践中的多学科案例讨论会议以及道德弹性训练。由于整体方法学质量较低且存在较高的偏倚风险,因此不能认为任何单一干预措施在管理道德困境方面都有效。
目前一些干预措施可能减轻重症监护医疗保健提供者所经历的道德困境,但证据较弱。需要更大规模的随机试验,纳入所有重症监护医护人员,以评估多方面的干预措施。