PEGASE (Physiology, Environment, and Genetics for the Animal and Livestock Systems), INRAE (French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment), Institut Agro, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.
IFIP (French Institute for Pig and Pork Industry), 35651 Le Rheu, France.
Animal. 2021 Aug;15(8):100240. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100240. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Consumers perceive pork products from local breeds reared in extensive systems positively because of their specific quality properties and regional identity. The sensory, nutritional and technological qualities of these products depend, among other things, on pig production, especially its climatic conditions and the availability of feed resources, which can influence traits of muscle and fat tissue. The present study (part 1) was part of a larger project that assessed the influence of the finishing season and feeding resources on carcass and tissue traits and the quality of meat and dry-cured ham from Gascon pigs in an extensive system. Following the specifications of the Protected Designation of Origin "Noir de Bigorre", castrated Gascon males were reared on rangelands (grassland and forest areas) and received a supplementary diet from 5 to 6 months of age until slaughter at a minimum of 12 months of age and ca. 170 kg live weight. Three finishing seasons were considered as follows: Winter (n = 18), Spring (n = 22) and Autumn (n = 23). To estimate specific effects of season on productive and quality traits and avoid bias due to effects of genes known to influence these traits, polymorphisms in the RYR1, PRKAG3, MC4R and LEPR genes were included in the analysis models. The finishing season did not influence growth rate. Compared to Winter pigs, Spring and Autumn pigs had slightly lower carcass fatness (P < 0.05), higher ultimate pH and redder and darker color of the Longissimus muscle (LM) (P < 0.01). Loin drip loss was low overall, but was higher for Spring pigs, whereas cooking loss and shear force were similar among seasons. Spring pigs tended to have the lowest LM lipid content, whereas LM myoglobin content remained unaffected. Autumn pigs had lower potential of lipid oxidation in LM than Winter and Spring pigs (P < 0.01), but muscle metabolic traits assessed via glycolytic and oxidative enzyme activities did not differ among seasons. The finishing season modified the backfat fatty acid (FA) profile, with a lower polyunsaturated FA percentage in Autumn pigs than Winter or Spring pigs (P < 0.001), even though the saturated and monounsaturated FA percentages did not differ. In particular, Spring pigs had the lowest n-6:n-3 and C18:2:C18:3 ratios (P < 0.001), as a result of grazing. Overall, Spring and Autumn finishing seasons seem more favorable to technological and sensory pork attributes, with an additional positive effect of Spring finishing on pork nutritional value.
消费者对在粗放系统中饲养的本地品种猪肉产品的评价较为积极,这是因为其具有独特的质量属性和地域特色。这些产品的感官、营养和技术特性在很大程度上取决于猪的生产,尤其是其气候条件和饲料资源的可获得性,这些因素会影响肌肉和脂肪组织的特性。本研究(第 1 部分)是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目评估了育肥季节和饲料资源对 Gascon 猪在粗放系统中胴体和组织特性以及肉和干腌火腿质量的影响。根据“Bigorre 黑色地区”的原产地名称保护规定,去势的 Gascon 公猪在牧场(草地和森林地区)饲养,并在 5 至 6 个月龄时接受补充饲料,直到至少 12 个月龄和约 170 公斤活重时屠宰。考虑了以下三个育肥季节:冬季(n=18)、春季(n=22)和秋季(n=23)。为了估计季节对生产和质量特性的具体影响,并避免因已知影响这些特性的基因的影响而产生偏差,在分析模型中包含了 RYR1、PRKAG3、MC4R 和 LEPR 基因的多态性。育肥季节不会影响生长速度。与冬季猪相比,春季和秋季猪的胴体脂肪度略低(P<0.05),最终 pH 值较高,背最长肌(LM)的颜色更红更暗(P<0.01)。腰肉的滴水损失总体较低,但春季猪的滴水损失较高,而烹饪损失和剪切力在季节之间相似。春季猪的 LM 脂质含量最低,而 LM 肌红蛋白含量不受影响。秋季猪的 LM 脂质氧化潜力低于冬季和春季猪(P<0.01),但通过糖酵解和氧化酶活性评估的肌肉代谢特性在季节之间没有差异。育肥季节改变了背脂的脂肪酸(FA)谱,秋季猪的多不饱和 FA 百分比低于冬季或春季猪(P<0.001),尽管饱和和单不饱和 FA 百分比没有差异。特别是,春季猪的 n-6:n-3 和 C18:2:C18:3 比例最低(P<0.001),这是放牧的结果。总的来说,春季和秋季的育肥季节似乎对猪肉的技术和感官特性更为有利,春季育肥对猪肉的营养价值还有额外的积极影响。