Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100906. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100906. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Advanced airway management (AAM) is commonly performed as part of advanced life support. However, there is controversy about the association between the timing of AAM and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to determine whether time to AAM is associated with outcomes after OHCA.
This was a nationwide population-based observational study using the Japanese government-led registry of OHCA. Adults who experienced OHCA and received AAM by EMS personnel in the prehospital setting from 2014 to 2017 were included. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between time to AAM (defined as time in minutes from emergency call to the first successful AAM) and outcomes after OHCA. Then, associations between early (≤ 20 min) vs. delayed (> 20 min) AAM and outcomes after OHCA were examined using propensity score-matched analyses. The primary outcome was one-month neurologically favourable survival.
A total of 164,223 patients (median [IQR] age, 80 [69-86] years; 57.7% male) were included. The median time to AAM was 17 min (IQR, 14-22). Longer time to AAM was significantly associated with a decreased chance of one-month neurologically favourable survival (multivariable adjusted OR per minute delay, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.90-0.91]). In the propensity score-matched cohort, compared with early AAM, delayed AAM was associated with a decreased chance of one-month neurologically favourable survival (516 of 50,997 [1.0%] vs. 226 of 50,997 [0.4%]; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.37-0.51; NNT, 176).
Delay in AAM was associated with a decreased chance of one-month neurologically favourable survival among patients with OHCA.
高级气道管理(AAM)通常作为高级生命支持的一部分进行。然而,关于 AAM 的时机与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后结果之间的关联存在争议。本研究旨在确定 AAM 的时间是否与 OHCA 后结果相关。
这是一项使用日本政府领导的 OHCA 注册中心进行的全国性基于人群的观察性研究。纳入 2014 年至 2017 年期间在院前环境中由 EMS 人员进行 OHCA 并接受 AAM 的成年人。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估 AAM 时间(定义为从紧急呼叫到首次成功 AAM 的分钟数)与 OHCA 后结果之间的关联。然后,使用倾向评分匹配分析检查早期(≤20 分钟)与晚期(>20 分钟)AAM 与 OHCA 后结果之间的关联。主要结局是一个月时神经功能良好的生存。
共纳入 164223 名患者(中位数[IQR]年龄,80[69-86]岁;57.7%为男性)。AAM 的中位时间为 17 分钟(IQR,14-22)。AAM 时间延长与一个月时神经功能良好的生存机会降低显著相关(每延迟一分钟的多变量调整 OR,0.90[95%CI,0.90-0.91])。在倾向评分匹配队列中,与早期 AAM 相比,延迟 AAM 与一个月时神经功能良好的生存机会降低相关(50997 例中的 516 例[1.0%]与 50997 例中的 226 例[0.4%];RR,0.44;95%CI,0.37-0.51;NNH,176)。
OHCA 患者 AAM 延迟与一个月时神经功能良好的生存机会降低相关。