Rigo Carla, Grazioli Marco, Caravella Giuseppe, Ursino Francesco, Zerla Pietro, Magon Arianna, Dellafiore Federica, Caruso Rosario
Oncology Day Hospital, Ospedale Maggiore di Novara, Novara, Italy.
Emergency Department, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
J Vasc Access. 2023 Mar;24(2):191-197. doi: 10.1177/11297298211026447. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
Assessing competency in the speciality of vascular access is still limited, and few valid and reliable tools are available. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate three different tools for assessing competency in managing the care of short peripheral cannulas (SPCs), midlines, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs), and arterial catheters (ACs) (tool one), placing SPCs (tool two), placing PICCs and midlines (tool three).
A two-phase and multi-method design was adopted. Phase one was implemented to develop the initial pool of items for each tool, starting from a literature overview. Panel discussions were adopted for developing the items. In phase two, the developed items were tested for content and face validity, involving a panel of 10 experts. Once obtained adequate content validity, a cross-sectional data collection was implemented to enroll three samples of healthcare workers who had to assess their competency through the developed tools. Dimensionality was assessed by performing a principal component analysis (PCA) and assessing internal consistency (Cronbach's α).
Tool one had 26 items, and the dimensionality was given by placement, risk assessment, procedure conformity and traceability, and patient education to self-care. Tool two had 35 items; its principal components were: risk evaluation, identification, clinical assessment and orientation to self-care, placement, and procedure registration shaped the competency of placing SPCs. Tool three had 31 items; its principal components were: risk assessment, placement, conformity to standards and procedure traceability, education, and orientation to self-care were the essential elements for adequately placing midlines and PICCs. Cronbach's α values ranged between 0.806 and 0.959.
The three developed tools reflected the core elements of competency in each application area, representing an initial framework that could be useful in future research and educational projects. Cross-national investigations are required to corroborate the described results.
评估血管通路专业的能力仍然有限,可用的有效且可靠的工具很少。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证三种不同的工具,用于评估管理短外周导管(SPC)、中线导管、经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)、中心静脉置管(CICC)和动脉导管(AC)护理的能力(工具一),评估SPC置管能力(工具二),评估PICC和中线导管置管能力(工具三)。
采用两阶段多方法设计。第一阶段从文献综述开始,为每个工具开发初始项目池。通过小组讨论来制定项目。在第二阶段,对开发的项目进行内容和表面效度测试,涉及10名专家组成的小组。一旦获得足够的内容效度,就进行横断面数据收集,招募三组医护人员,他们必须通过开发的工具评估自己的能力。通过主成分分析(PCA)和评估内部一致性(Cronbach's α)来评估维度。
工具一有26个项目,其维度由置管、风险评估、操作合规性与可追溯性以及患者自我护理教育组成。工具二有35个项目;其主要成分包括:风险评估、识别、临床评估与自我护理指导、置管以及操作记录,这些构成了SPC置管能力。工具三有31个项目;其主要成分包括:风险评估、置管、符合标准与操作可追溯性、教育以及自我护理指导,这些是正确放置中线导管和PICC的关键要素。Cronbach's α值在0.806至0.959之间。
开发的这三种工具反映了每个应用领域能力的核心要素,代表了一个初步框架,可能对未来的研究和教育项目有用。需要进行跨国调查来证实上述结果。