Suppr超能文献

减速辅助减轻了行动感与驾驶性能之间的权衡。

Deceleration Assistance Mitigated the Trade-off Between Sense of Agency and Driving Performance.

作者信息

Wen Wen, Yun Sonmin, Yamashita Atsushi, Northcutt Brandon D, Asama Hajime

机构信息

Department of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Toyota Research Institute, One Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;12:643516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643516. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Driving assistance technology has gained traction in recent years and is becoming more widely used in vehicles. However, drivers usually experience a reduced sense of agency when driving assistance is active even though automated assistance improves driving performance by reducing human error and ensuring quick reactions. The present study examined whether driving assistance can maintain human sense of agency during early deceleration in the face of collision risk, compared with manual deceleration. In the experimental task, participants decelerate their vehicle in a driving simulator to avoid collision with a vehicle that suddenly cut in front of them and decelerated. In the assisted condition, the system performed deceleration 100 ms after the cut-in. Participants were instructed to decelerate their vehicle and follow the vehicle that cut-in. This design ensured that the deceleration assistance applied a similar control to the vehicle as the drivers intended to, only faster and smoother. Participants rated their sense of agency and their driving performance. The results showed that drivers maintained their sense of agency and improved driving performance under driving assistance. The findings provided insights into designing driving assistance that can maintain drivers' sense of agency while improving future driving performance. It is important to establish a mode of joint-control in which the system shares the intention of human drivers and provides improved execution of control.

摘要

近年来,驾驶辅助技术越来越受到关注,并在车辆中得到更广泛的应用。然而,即使自动辅助通过减少人为失误和确保快速反应来提高驾驶性能,但在驾驶辅助启动时,驾驶员通常会体验到一种能动性降低的感觉。本研究考察了与手动减速相比,在面临碰撞风险时的早期减速过程中,驾驶辅助能否维持人类的能动性。在实验任务中,参与者在驾驶模拟器中对车辆进行减速,以避免与突然切入前方并减速的车辆相撞。在辅助条件下,系统在车辆切入后100毫秒执行减速。参与者被指示对自己的车辆进行减速,并跟随切入的车辆。这种设计确保了减速辅助对车辆施加的控制与驾驶员的意图相似,只是更快、更平稳。参与者对自己的能动性和驾驶性能进行了评分。结果表明,在驾驶辅助下,驾驶员保持了他们的能动性,并提高了驾驶性能。这些发现为设计驾驶辅助提供了见解,即在提高未来驾驶性能的同时,能够维持驾驶员的能动性。建立一种系统共享人类驾驶员意图并提供更好控制执行的联合控制模式很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58dc/8208475/d7dd0a39f34b/fpsyg-12-643516-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Deceleration Assistance Mitigated the Trade-off Between Sense of Agency and Driving Performance.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;12:643516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643516. eCollection 2021.
2
Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(1):42-47. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1707194. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
The Sense of Agency in Driving Automation.
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 3;10:2691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02691. eCollection 2019.
6
Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
9
Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
Hum Factors. 2021 Nov;63(7):1295-1315. doi: 10.1177/0018720820926092. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
The Active Sensing of Control Difference.
iScience. 2020 May 22;23(5):101112. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101112. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Sense of Agency Beyond Sensorimotor Process: Decoding Self-Other Action Attribution in the Human Brain.
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4076-4091. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa028.
4
The Sense of Agency in Driving Automation.
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 3;10:2691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02691. eCollection 2019.
5
I just lost it! Fear and anger reduce the sense of agency: a study using intentional binding.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1205-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5461-6. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
6
Automation Expectation Mismatch: Incorrect Prediction Despite Eyes on Threat and Hands on Wheel.
Hum Factors. 2018 Dec;60(8):1095-1116. doi: 10.1177/0018720818788164. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
Control Changes the Way We Look at the World.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30(4):603-619. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01226. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
The influence of performance on action-effect integration in sense of agency.
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study.
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验