Wen Wen, Yamashita Atsushi, Asama Hajime
Department of Precision Engineering, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Sense of agency refers to the subjective feeling of being able to control an outcome through one's own actions or will. Prior studies have shown that both sensory processing (e.g., comparisons between sensory feedbacks and predictions basing on one's motor intentions) and high-level cognitive/constructive processes (e.g., inferences based on one's performance or the consequences of one's actions) contribute to judgments of sense of agency. However, it remains unclear how these two types of processes interact, which is important for clarifying the mechanisms underlying sense of agency. Thus, we examined whether performance-based inferences influence action-effect integration in sense of agency using a delay detection paradigm in two experiments. In both experiments, participants pressed left and right arrow keys to control the direction in which a moving dot was travelling. The dot's response delay was manipulated randomly on 7 levels (0-480ms) between the trials; for each trial, participants were asked to judge whether the dot response was delayed and to rate their level of agency over the dot. In Experiment 1, participants tried to direct the dot to reach a destination on the screen as quickly as possible. Furthermore, the computer assisted participants by ignoring erroneous commands for half of the trials (assisted condition), while in the other half, all of the participants' commands were executed (self-control condition). In Experiment 2, participants directed the dot as they pleased (without a specific goal), but, in half of the trials, the computer randomly ignored 32% of their commands (disturbed condition) rather than assisted them. The results from the two experiments showed that performance enhanced action-effect integration. Specifically, when task performance was improved through the computer's assistance in Experiment 1, delay detection was reduced in the 480-ms delay condition, despite the fact that 32% of participants' commands were ignored. Conversely, when no feedback on task performance was given (as in Experiment 2), the participants reported greater delay when some of their commands were randomly ignored. Furthermore, the results of a logistic regression analysis showed that the threshold of delay detection was greater in the assisted condition than in the self-control condition in Experiment 1, which suggests a wider time window for action-effect integration. A multivariate analysis also revealed that assistance was related to reduced delay detection via task performance, while reduced delay detection was directly correlated with a better sense of agency. These results indicate an association between the implicit and explicit aspects of sense of agency.
能动感是指通过自身行动或意志来控制结果的主观感受。先前的研究表明,感觉加工(例如,感觉反馈与基于运动意图的预测之间的比较)和高级认知/建构过程(例如,基于个人表现或行为后果的推断)都有助于能动感的判断。然而,这两种过程如何相互作用仍不清楚,这对于阐明能动感背后的机制很重要。因此,我们在两个实验中使用延迟检测范式来研究基于表现的推断是否会影响能动感中的动作-效果整合。在两个实验中,参与者按下左右箭头键来控制一个移动点的移动方向。在各次试验之间,点的反应延迟在7个水平(0 - 480毫秒)上随机操纵;对于每次试验,要求参与者判断点的反应是否延迟,并对他们对该点的能动水平进行评分。在实验1中,参与者试图尽快引导点到达屏幕上的一个目标。此外,在一半的试验中,计算机通过忽略错误命令来协助参与者(协助条件),而在另一半试验中,参与者的所有命令都被执行(自我控制条件)。在实验2中,参与者按自己的意愿引导点(没有特定目标),但在一半的试验中,计算机随机忽略他们32%的命令(干扰条件)而不是协助他们。两个实验的结果表明,表现增强了动作-效果整合。具体而言,在实验1中当通过计算机协助提高任务表现时,在480毫秒延迟条件下延迟检测减少,尽管32%的参与者命令被忽略。相反,当没有给出关于任务表现的反馈时(如在实验2中),当他们的一些命令被随机忽略时参与者报告更大的延迟。此外,逻辑回归分析的结果表明,在实验1中协助条件下的延迟检测阈值大于自我控制条件下的阈值,这表明动作-效果整合的时间窗口更宽。多变量分析还显示,协助与通过任务表现减少延迟检测有关,而延迟检测的减少与更好的能动感直接相关。这些结果表明了能动感的内隐和外显方面之间的关联。