Karbeyaz Fatih, Kissling Seraphina, Jaklin Paul Julius, Bachofner Jaqueline, Brunner Barbara, Müllhaupt Beat, Winder Thomas, Mertens Joachim C, Misselwitz Benjamin, von Felten Stefanie, Siebenhüner Alexander R
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.
Master Program in Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Jun 11;8:565-574. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S289955. eCollection 2021.
Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized the therapy of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and have replaced previous PEG-interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) treatment. Patients with CHC and advanced liver disease are at increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effects of DAA-based CHC treatment on subsequent HCC incidence remain poorly understood.
This retrospective single-institution cohort study included 243 consecutive patients after PEG-IFN/RBV and 263 patients after DAA treatment. Multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to HCC between treatment types, censoring patients who died or had an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) at the time of the competing event. Age, gender, BMI, viral load, cirrhosis, fibrosis stage, diabetes, virus genotype and previous PEG-IFN/RBV (before DAA) were used as covariates. In addition, we performed a propensity score-matched analysis.
Nineteen HCC cases were observed after DAA therapy compared to 18 cases after PEG-IFN/RBV treatment. Patients were followed for a median of 4.1 years (IQR: 3.5-4.7) for DAA and 9.3 years (IQR: 6.6-12.4) for the PEG-IFN/RBV group. In an unadjusted Cox model, a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.40 (CI: 2.20-18.61, p=0.006) for HCC following DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV was estimated. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, age and liver cirrhosis were identified as further HCC risk factors but the HR estimates for DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV still indicate a considerably increased hazard associated with DAA treatment (HR between 7.23 and 11.52, p≤0.001, depending on covariates). A HR of 6.62 (CI: 2.01-21.84, p=0.002) for DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV was estimated in the propensity score-matched analysis. The secondary outcomes death and OLT did not differ between treatment groups.
In a cohort study from a tertiary care hospital rates of HCC after the start of DAA treatment were higher compared to PEG-IFN/RBV treatment. Our data reinforce the recommendation that surveillance should be continued after successful CHC treatment.
直接抗病毒药物(DAA)彻底改变了慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)的治疗方式,取代了先前的聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林(PEG-IFN/RBV)治疗。CHC和晚期肝病患者发生肝细胞癌(HCC)的风险增加。然而,基于DAA的CHC治疗对后续HCC发病率的影响仍知之甚少。
这项回顾性单机构队列研究纳入了243例接受PEG-IFN/RBV治疗后的连续患者以及263例接受DAA治疗后的患者。使用多变量特定病因Cox比例风险模型比较不同治疗类型发生HCC的时间,对在竞争事件发生时死亡或接受原位肝移植(OLT)的患者进行截尾处理。将年龄、性别、体重指数、病毒载量、肝硬化、纤维化分期、糖尿病、病毒基因型以及先前的PEG-IFN/RBV(在DAA治疗之前)用作协变量。此外,我们进行了倾向评分匹配分析。
DAA治疗后观察到19例HCC病例,而PEG-IFN/RBV治疗后为18例。DAA组患者的中位随访时间为4.1年(四分位间距:3.5 - 4.7年),PEG-IFN/RBV组为9.3年(四分位间距:6.6 - 12.4年)。在未调整的Cox模型中,估计DAA治疗后发生HCC的风险比(HR)为6.40(置信区间:2.20 - 18.61,p = 0.006),而PEG-IFN/RBV治疗后为1。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,年龄和肝硬化被确定为进一步的HCC风险因素,但DAA与PEG-IFN/RBV的HR估计仍表明与DAA治疗相关的风险显著增加(HR在7.23至11.52之间,p≤0.001,取决于协变量)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,DAA与PEG-IFN/RBV的HR估计为6.62(置信区间:2.01 - 21.84,p = 0.002)。次要结局死亡和OLT在治疗组之间无差异。
在一家三级医疗医院进行的队列研究中,DAA治疗开始后HCC的发生率高于PEG-IFN/RBV治疗。我们的数据强化了CHC治疗成功后仍应继续监测的建议。