Edwards J M, Taylor L M, Porter J M
Division of Vascular Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201.
Arch Surg. 1988 Sep;123(9):1164-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330144022.
We reviewed our experience with femoral-popliteal-tibial reversed vein bypasses performed for limb salvage in 226 patients without and 19 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While 18-month primary patency rates were comparable (85% and 89%), limb salvage was significantly lower (76% vs 95%) in patients with ESRD. Five amputations in the ESRD group were required for nonhealing, large foot ulcers in diabetic patients despite patent arterial bypass while only five of 13 amputations in patients without ESRD were required in the presence of patent grafts. The need for major amputation despite patent bypass in diabetic patients with ESRD who have extensive foot gangrene or ischemic ulceration occurs sufficiently often that we recommend primary amputation be considered in these patients without regard to possible vascular reconstruction.
我们回顾了为226例非终末期肾病患者和19例终末期肾病(ESRD)患者行股-腘-胫静脉转流术以挽救肢体的经验。虽然18个月的原发性通畅率相当(分别为85%和89%),但ESRD患者的肢体挽救率显著较低(76%对95%)。ESRD组中有5例截肢是由于糖尿病患者足部大溃疡不愈合,尽管动脉搭桥通畅,而无ESRD患者的13例截肢中只有5例是在移植物通畅的情况下进行的。患有广泛足部坏疽或缺血性溃疡的ESRD糖尿病患者,尽管搭桥通畅仍需要进行大截肢的情况很常见,因此我们建议对这些患者考虑一期截肢,而不考虑可能的血管重建。