Suppr超能文献

缝线是否能减少前交叉韧带重建中干扰螺钉引起的移植物撕裂?一项体外生物力学研究。

Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, No. 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, 730030, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.

Orthopaedics Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, 730030, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis.

RESULTS

All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws.

摘要

背景

在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中,通常使用干扰螺钉固定移植物。然而,先前的研究报告称,干扰螺钉的插入会显著导致移植物撕裂。本研究的目的是:(1)定量评估单次插入 PEEK 干扰螺钉对移植物的撕裂程度;(2)确定在 ACL 重建中,使用不同类型的缝线是否可以减少单次插入干扰螺钉对移植物的撕裂。

方法

采用猪胫骨和牛后肢趾伸肌腱制作 ACL 重建的体外模型。采用三种缝线(可吸收缝线、Ethibond 缝线和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线)对移植物的末端进行缝合。使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)干扰螺钉固定胫骨。本研究分为五组(每组 10 个):未固定组、未缝合组、可吸收缝线组、Ethibond 缝线组和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线组。以 10mm/min 的速度进行拉伸至破坏的加载试验,进行生物力学测试。记录拉伸刚度(每毫米牛顿数)、破坏吸收能量(焦耳)和极限载荷(牛顿)进行分析。

结果

所有准备好的肌腱和骨标本在所有组之间具有相似的特征(长度、重量、肌腱的预张力、胫骨骨密度)(P>0.05)。生物力学测试表明,PEEK 干扰螺钉显著导致移植物撕裂(P<0.05)。然而,所有缝线(可吸收缝线、Ethibond 缝线和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线)均不能减少 ACL 重建中移植物的撕裂(P>0.05)。

结论

本生物力学研究表明,在 ACL 重建中单次插入 PEEK 干扰螺钉后,移植物的极限失效载荷降低了约 25%。使用不同缝线(可吸收缝线、Ethibond 缝线和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线)缝合移植物的末端并不能减少干扰螺钉引起的移植物撕裂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fa3/8218482/b7b820b3cdf8/12891_2021_4457_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验