Ul Islam Mujahid, Ahmad Imtiaz, Khan Bahauddin, Jan Azam, Ali Niaz, Hassan Khan Waasay, Farooq Omer, Khan Hooria, Ahmad Ali Faizan, Shahid Muhammad
Anesthesiology, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK.
Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2021 May 18;13(5):e15091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15091.
Introduction Re-explorations after open-heart surgery are often required if the patient is bleeding or shows features of cardiovascular instability and does not improve with conservative measures. Our study aims to determine whether timely re-exploration of patients who are bleeding has an impact on the morbidity and mortality of the patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 75 patients that underwent open-heart surgery and subsequently underwent chest re-exploration for excessive bleeding betweenMarch 2018 and March 2020. Patients who were reopened post-op for indications other than excessive bleeding were excluded. Results A total number of cases were 700, out of which 75 (9.3%) patients were reopened, as compared to the literature, which shows worldwide 2-11% being reopened. Post-operative drain output was 1000ml to 1500ml in 47 (62.7%) and more than 1500ml in 28 (37.3%) patients before they were reopened. In 67 (89.3%) patients, three to five units of blood were transfused, and in eight (10.7%) patients, more than five units of blood were transfused. We believe our mortality in the reopened patients was low, because of timely intervention and early re-exploration, and is probably the reason why our figures land in a higher range (2-11%) of reopened cases (9.3%). Reopening time was less than five hours in 49 (65.3%) patients and less than 10 hours in 26 (34.7%) patients in our study. We tried to minimize the loss of blood and re-explored the patients before they lose excessive blood, the average time for reopening in our study was less than 10 hours. The average intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 4.2 days (range three to six days). Wound infections were reported in one of three patients. There was no mortality in these patients. Surgical site of bleeding was identified in 54 (72%) patients and no particular site was found in 21 (28%) patients. Suggesting that it is common to have a surgical bleeder than coagulopathy induced bleeding in post-cardiac surgery patients Conclusions We believe our low mortality (0%) is due to early reopening in patients who are bleeding excessively after cardiac surgery.
引言 如果心脏手术后患者出现出血或心血管不稳定特征且保守治疗无效,通常需要再次手术探查。我们的研究旨在确定对出血患者进行及时再次手术探查是否会对患者的发病率和死亡率产生影响。
方法 对2018年3月至2020年3月期间接受心脏直视手术并因出血过多随后进行胸部再次探查的75例患者进行回顾性分析。排除术后因出血过多以外的其他指征而再次手术的患者。
结果 总病例数为700例,其中75例(9.3%)患者进行了再次手术,与文献报道相比,全球范围内再次手术的比例为2% - 11%。在再次手术前,47例(62.7%)患者的术后引流量为1000ml至1500ml,28例(37.3%)患者的引流量超过1500ml。67例(89.3%)患者输注了三至五个单位的血液,8例(10.7%)患者输注了超过五个单位的血液。我们认为我们再次手术患者的死亡率较低,这是由于及时干预和早期再次手术探查,这可能也是我们的数据落在较高范围(2% - 11%)的再次手术病例(9.3%)中的原因。在我们的研究中,49例(65.3%)患者的再次手术时间少于5小时,26例(34.7%)患者的再次手术时间少于10小时。我们试图尽量减少失血,并在患者失血过多之前对其进行再次手术探查,我们研究中的再次手术平均时间少于10小时。重症监护病房(ICU)的平均住院时间为4.2天(范围为3至6天)。3例患者中有1例报告了伤口感染。这些患者中没有死亡病例。54例(72%)患者确定了手术出血部位,21例(28%)患者未发现特定部位。这表明心脏手术后患者手术出血比凝血功能障碍引起的出血更常见。
结论 我们认为我们的低死亡率(0%)是由于对心脏手术后出血过多的患者进行了早期再次手术。