Suppr超能文献

针对成年人营养、身体活动、久坐行为或肥胖的电子健康干预措施:系统评价的范围综述。

eHealth interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, or obesity in adults: A scoping review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, and Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Flinders Digital Health Research Centre, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Obes Rev. 2021 Oct;22(10):e13295. doi: 10.1111/obr.13295. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

Abstract

A vast body of evidence regarding eHealth interventions for nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and obesity exists. This scoping review of systematic reviews aimed to evaluate the current level of evidence in this growing field. Seven electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews published until October 27, 2019. The systematic reviews must have included adult participants only and have evaluated eHealth behavioral interventions with the primary aim of changing nutrition, physical activity, and sedentary behavior or treating or preventing overweight and obesity. One hundred and six systematic reviews, published from 2006 to 2019, were included. Almost all (n = 98) reviews evaluated the efficacy of interventions. Over half (n = 61) included interventions focused on physical activity, followed by treatment of obesity (n = 28), nutrition (n = 22), prevention of obesity (n = 18), and sedentary behavior (n = 6). Many reviews (n = 46) evaluated one type of eHealth intervention only, while 60 included two or more types. Most reviews (n = 67) were rated as being of critically low methodological quality. This scoping review identified an increasing volume of systematic reviews evaluating eHealth interventions. It highlights several evidence gaps (e.g., evaluation of other outcomes, such as reach, engagement, or cost effectiveness), guiding future research efforts in this area.

摘要

大量证据表明,电子健康干预措施在营养、身体活动、久坐行为和肥胖方面具有积极作用。本系统评价综述旨在评估这一不断发展领域的现有证据水平。我们在七个电子数据库中搜索了截至 2019 年 10 月 27 日发表的系统评价。这些系统评价必须仅包括成年参与者,并评估了以改变营养、身体活动和久坐行为或治疗或预防超重和肥胖为主要目标的电子健康行为干预措施。共纳入 106 篇系统评价,发表于 2006 年至 2019 年期间。几乎所有(n=98)综述都评估了干预措施的疗效。超过一半(n=61)综述包括专注于身体活动的干预措施,其次是肥胖治疗(n=28)、营养(n=22)、肥胖预防(n=18)和久坐行为(n=6)。许多综述(n=46)仅评估了一种类型的电子健康干预措施,而 60 篇综述则包括两种或更多类型。大多数综述(n=67)的方法学质量被评为极低。本系统评价确定了越来越多的系统评价评估电子健康干预措施。它突出了几个证据差距(例如,评估其他结果,如可及性、参与度或成本效益),为该领域的未来研究工作提供了指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验