Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju.
Elderly Frailty Research Center, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26353. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026353.
Induced premature menopause accelerates the rate of body composition changes (decrease in skeletal muscle mass and increase in fat mass) and deteriorating physical function. However, few studies have focused on the impact of premature natural menopause. This study aimed to investigate the impact of age at natural menopause (ANM) on body composition and physical function in elderly women.Using data from the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study, 765 community-dwelling elderly women aged 70 to 85 years who experienced natural menopause were recruited in this study. Body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Physical function was evaluated by grip strength, the timed up and go test (TUG), and the short physical performance battery (SPPB). Participants were categorized into 4 groups according to their ANM: <40 (premature natural menopause, PNM), 40 to 44 (early natural menopause, ENM), 45 to 54 (normal menopause, NM), and ≥55 (late menopause, LM) years.There were no significant differences in the body composition parameters, such as the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (PNM: 5.90 ± 0.90 vs ENM: 5.91 ± 0.70 vs NM: 5.85 ± 0.73 vs LM: 5.90 ± 0.75, kg/m2, P = .75) and trunk fat mass index (PNM: 19.4 ± 3.9 vs ENM: 19.9 ± 4.4 vs NM: 19.9 ± 3.9 vs LM: 20.0 ± 3.8, %, P = .87) between the groups. In the physical function evaluation, there was no significant difference between the groups in grip strength (PNM: 19.8 ± 0.6 vs ENM: 20.3 ± 0.4 vs NM: 20.6 ± 0.2 vs LM: 20.6 ± 0.4, kg, P = .53). However, in the TUG (PNM: 11.8 ± 0.4 vs ENM: 10.3 ± 0.3 vs NM: 10.6 ± 0.1 vs LM: 10.2 ± 0.3, seconds, P < .01) and SPPB (PNM: 10.0 ± 0.2 vs ENM: 10.5 ± 0.2 vs NM: 10.6 ± 0.1 vs LM: 10.8 ± 0.2, points, P < .05), the PNM group showed significantly lower values than the other groups did. There was no difference in physical function between the groups except the PNM.Premature natural menopause did not affect the body composition in elderly women but was associated with physical function deterioration. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the prevention of the physical function deterioration caused by premature natural menopause in elderly women.
自然绝经年龄对老年女性身体成分和身体功能的影响
目的:探讨自然绝经年龄(age at natural menopause,ANM)对老年女性身体成分和身体功能的影响。
使用韩国衰弱和老龄化队列研究的数据,纳入了 765 名年龄在 70 至 85 岁之间经历自然绝经的社区居住的老年女性。使用双能 X 射线吸收法测量身体成分。通过握力、计时起立行走测试(timed up and go test,TUG)和简易体能状况量表(short physical performance battery,SPPB)评估身体功能。根据 ANM 将参与者分为 4 组:<40 岁(过早自然绝经,premature natural menopause,PNM)、40 至 44 岁(早期自然绝经,early natural menopause,ENM)、45 至 54 岁(正常绝经,normal menopause,NM)和≥55 岁(晚期绝经,late menopause,LM)。
在身体成分参数方面,各组间无显著差异,如四肢骨骼肌质量指数(PNM:5.90±0.90 vs ENM:5.91±0.70 vs NM:5.85±0.73 vs LM:5.90±0.75,kg/m2,P=0.75)和躯干脂肪质量指数(PNM:19.4±3.9 vs ENM:19.9±4.4 vs NM:19.9±3.9 vs LM:20.0±3.8,%,P=0.87)。在身体功能评估中,握力各组间无显著差异(PNM:19.8±0.6 vs ENM:20.3±0.4 vs NM:20.6±0.2 vs LM:20.6±0.4,kg,P=0.53)。然而,在 TUG(PNM:11.8±0.4 vs ENM:10.3±0.3 vs NM:10.6±0.1 vs LM:10.2±0.3,秒,P<0.01)和 SPPB(PNM:10.0±0.2 vs ENM:10.5±0.2 vs NM:10.6±0.1 vs LM:10.8±0.2,分,P<0.05)方面,PNM 组的得分显著低于其他组。除 PNM 组外,各组间的身体功能无差异。
过早的自然绝经不会影响老年女性的身体成分,但与身体功能恶化有关。因此,应更加关注老年女性因过早自然绝经导致的身体功能恶化问题。