Department of Ophthalmology, T. C. Demiroglu Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;35(4):280-286. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0109. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
To compare functional and anatomic outcome of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in neovascular age-related macular degeneration by using the treat and extend (TE) protocol.
In this retrospective chart study, treatment naïve 74 eyes of 74 age-related macular degeneration patients treated with IVR and IVA (38 eyes in IVR and 36 eyes in IVA group) with TE protocol were included. Following three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections, TE protocol was applied to each group. Patients were followed up for at least 36 months. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macula thickness (CMT) and injection numbers over 3 years were compared.
Among 36 months period, the mean number of injections was 17 ± 4 for both groups (p > 0.05). In terms of CMT, there was no statistically significant difference between groups at 36 months compared to baseline. A decrease of 72.55 ± 39.37 μm in CMT was detected in IVR group, whereas the decrease was 70.58 ± 33.96 μm in IVA group (p > 0.05). There was a significant increase in BCVA at 36 months of measurements. In addition, BCVA demonstrated an increase of 4.1 ± 0.44 letters in IVR group and 4.36 ± 0.67 letters in IVA group after 36 months compared to the baseline (p > 0.05).
Both IVR and IVA injections provided significant improvements and stability in BCVA and CMT, however there was no significant difference between IVR and IVA injections with TE protocol of 36 months.
通过使用“治疗与随访(TREAT AND EXTEND,TE)”方案,比较玻璃体内雷珠单抗(IVR)和玻璃体内阿柏西普(IVA)治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的功能和解剖学结果。
在这项回顾性图表研究中,纳入了 74 例年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的 74 只眼(IVR 组 38 只眼,IVA 组 36 只眼),这些患者均为初次接受治疗,并且使用 TE 方案接受了 IVR 和 IVA 治疗。在连续三次每月的玻璃体内注射后,每组均应用 TE 方案。患者的随访时间至少为 36 个月。比较两组患者在 3 年内最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和注射次数的平均变化。
在 36 个月期间,两组患者的平均注射次数均为 17 ± 4(p > 0.05)。与基线相比,在 36 个月时,两组患者的 CMT 没有统计学上的显著差异。IVR 组的 CMT 下降了 72.55 ± 39.37μm,而 IVA 组的 CMT 下降了 70.58 ± 33.96μm(p > 0.05)。在 36 个月的测量中,BCVA 显著增加。此外,与基线相比,IVR 组的 BCVA 在 36 个月后增加了 4.1 ± 0.44 个字母,IVA 组增加了 4.36 ± 0.67 个字母(p > 0.05)。
在 TE 方案 36 个月的治疗中,IVR 和 IVA 注射均能显著改善 BCVA 和 CMT,且两者之间无显著差异。