Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 25;14(1):11997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62536-8.
This study compares the effectiveness of Conbercept and Aflibercept in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University's Ophthalmology Department (May 2020-May 2023), this prospective study enrolled 159 nAMD patients. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving 0.5 mg Conbercept and the other 2 mg Aflibercept intravitreal injections. Over 12 months, the study, employing a Treat-and-Extend (T&E) regimen, assessed Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) changes and injection frequency. Of the 159 patients, 137 (149 eyes) completed the study. No significant age difference was found between the groups (P = 0.331). After 12 months, BCVA improved similarly in both groups (Conbercept: 52.8 ± 18.9, Aflibercept: 52.0 ± 19.7 letters; P = 0.820). CRT reduction was also comparable (Conbercept: 246.3 ± 82.8 µm, Aflibercept: 275.9 ± 114.3 µm; P = 0.079). Injection frequencies averaged 6.9 ± 0.7 (Conbercept) and 6.7 ± 0.7 (Aflibercept; P = 0.255). Subtype analysis revealed Type 1 MNV had higher baseline BCVA and lower CRT, with more frequent injections compared to other types. Both Conbercept and Aflibercept are clinically similar in efficacy for nAMD, with the T&E regimen proving therapeutically effective and potentially reducing patient costs. Anti-VEGF treatment efficacy varies across nAMD subtypes, indicating a potential benefit in tailored treatments for specific subtypes.Clinical trial registration number NCT05539235 (Protocol Registration and Results System).
本研究比较了康柏西普(conbercept)和阿柏西普(aflibercept)治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的疗效。这项前瞻性研究在重庆医科大学附属第一医院眼科进行(2020 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月),共纳入 159 例 nAMD 患者。参与者被随机分为两组:一组接受 0.5mg 康柏西普,另一组接受 2mg 阿柏西普玻璃体内注射。在 12 个月的时间里,该研究采用“治疗-扩展(T&E)”方案,评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心视网膜厚度(CRT)变化和注射频率。在 159 例患者中,有 137 例(149 只眼)完成了研究。两组间年龄无显著差异(P=0.331)。12 个月后,两组的 BCVA 均有相似的改善(康柏西普:52.8±18.9,阿柏西普:52.0±19.7 字母;P=0.820)。CRT 降低也相当(康柏西普:246.3±82.8µm,阿柏西普:275.9±114.3µm;P=0.079)。平均注射频率分别为 6.9±0.7(康柏西普)和 6.7±0.7(阿柏西普;P=0.255)。亚型分析显示,1 型 MNV 基线 BCVA 较高,CRT 较低,与其他类型相比,注射频率更高。康柏西普和阿柏西普在治疗 nAMD 的疗效上具有临床相似性,T&E 方案被证明具有治疗效果,并可能降低患者成本。抗 VEGF 治疗的疗效在 nAMD 亚型之间存在差异,这表明针对特定亚型的个体化治疗可能具有潜在益处。临床试验注册号 NCT05539235(方案注册和结果系统)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-5-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-2-8
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022-6-20
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020