• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦健康与幸福感调查:研究设计、回应比例和应答者特征。

The Danish Health and Wellbeing Survey: Study design, response proportion and respondent characteristics.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):959-967. doi: 10.1177/14034948211022429. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/14034948211022429
PMID:34162289
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to describe the study design and respondent characteristics (including non-response analyses) of the Danish Health and Wellbeing Surveys in 2015 and 2019 and a follow-up survey that was carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

METHODS

The Danish Health and Wellbeing Survey is the Danish part of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS). The samples in 2015 (=12,000) and 2019 (=14,000) were both based on a simple random selection of individuals aged ⩾15 years from the Danish Civil Registration System. All individuals from the sample in 2019 who were still alive and living in Denmark were reinvited for a follow-up survey in 2020 (=13,474). Data in all surveys were collected via self-administered questionnaires (web or paper based). The questionnaires in 2015 and 2019 included the EHIS model questionnaire as well as national questions, whereas the questionnaire in 2020 mainly focused on physical and mental health, employment and working lives, and health behaviour.

RESULTS

The overall response proportion declined slightly between 2015 (48.4%) and 2019 (47.4%) but went up to 49.8% in the follow-up survey in 2020. Unit non-response was associated with, for example, male sex, younger age, being unmarried and lower educational level but not with degree of urbanisation. In all, 5000 individuals completed the questionnaire in both 2019 and 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are in line with most previous research on non-response in health surveys. However, an association between degree of urbanisation and non-response has been suggested in previous studies. This association was not found in our study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述 2015 年、2019 年丹麦健康与幸福感调查以及在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的后续调查的研究设计和应答者特征(包括非应答分析)。

方法

丹麦健康与幸福感调查是欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)的丹麦部分。2015 年(=12000 人)和 2019 年(=14000 人)的样本均基于丹麦民事登记系统中年龄 ⩾15 岁的个体的简单随机选择。2019 年样本中所有仍然在世并居住在丹麦的个体均被邀请参加 2020 年的后续调查(=13474 人)。所有调查的数据均通过自填式问卷(网络或纸质)收集。2015 年和 2019 年的问卷包括 EHIS 模式问卷以及国家问题,而 2020 年的问卷主要关注身心健康、就业和工作生活以及健康行为。

结果

总体应答率在 2015 年(48.4%)和 2019 年(47.4%)之间略有下降,但在 2020 年的后续调查中上升至 49.8%。单位未应答与例如男性、年轻、未婚和较低的教育水平有关,但与城市化程度无关。共有 5000 人在 2019 年和 2020 年完成了问卷。

结论

结果与大多数先前关于健康调查中未应答的研究一致。然而,先前的研究表明,城市化程度与未应答之间存在关联。在我们的研究中未发现这种关联。

相似文献

1
The Danish Health and Wellbeing Survey: Study design, response proportion and respondent characteristics.丹麦健康与幸福感调查:研究设计、回应比例和应答者特征。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):959-967. doi: 10.1177/14034948211022429. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics.丹麦健康和发病调查:研究设计和参与者特征。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 3;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0733-9.
3
The Danish National Health Survey: Study design, response rate and respondent characteristics in 2010, 2013 and 2017.丹麦国家健康调查:2010、2013 和 2017 年的研究设计、应答率和应答者特征。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):180-188. doi: 10.1177/1403494820966534. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
4
The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics.丹麦 2010 年全国健康调查。研究设计和应答者特征。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Jun;40(4):391-7. doi: 10.1177/1403494812451412.
5
The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys.丹麦全国健康访谈调查的研究设计与特点。
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Sep;37(7):758-65. doi: 10.1177/1403494809341095. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
6
Mental wellbeing among Danish employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a longitudinal study on the role of industry and working environment.丹麦员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间的精神健康状况:一项关于行业和工作环境作用的纵向研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;32(6):871-876. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac150.
7
Mental well-being and patient activation during the first eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark - a cohort study among 710 Danish adults with chronic conditions.丹麦 COVID-19 大流行的头八个月期间的心理健康和患者激活 - 一项针对 710 名丹麦慢性病患者的队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):1472. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16316-0.
8
Uncovering survivorship bias in longitudinal mental health surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic.揭示COVID-19大流行期间纵向心理健康调查中的幸存者偏差。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 May 26;30:e45. doi: 10.1017/S204579602100038X.
9
The Danish National Youth Study 2014: Study design, population characteristics and non-response analysis.丹麦国家青年研究 2014:研究设计、人口特征和无回应分析。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Mar;48(2):224-232. doi: 10.1177/1403494817729283. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
The Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity (DANSDA) 1995-2011-2013: Study design, study participants, participation rate and underreporting.丹麦饮食和体力活动全国调查(DANSDA)1995-2011-2013:研究设计、研究参与者、参与率和漏报率。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Aug;52(6):752-760. doi: 10.1177/14034948231190681. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the emotional burden of participating in trauma-related surveys discourage future participation? A population-based study.参与创伤相关调查的情感负担是否会阻碍未来的参与?一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2514888. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2514888. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Barriers and motivators associated with COVID-19 vaccination-a vaccine acceptance scoring system based on a population survey in southern Sweden.与新冠病毒疫苗接种相关的障碍和动机——基于瑞典南部一项人口调查的疫苗接受度评分系统
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):477-483. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf030.
3
The impact of reminders on representativeness and survey estimates among web-mode invited in the Danish National Health Survey.
提醒对丹麦国家健康调查中网络模式邀请对象的代表性及调查估计值的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):256-262. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae176.
4
German adult population norm values of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS).德国成年人短式华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)的常模值。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2145-2150. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03695-z. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
Changes in weight status during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact of educational level and mental health.新冠疫情期间体重状况的变化:教育水平和心理健康的影响
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):190-195. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad188.
6
Factors related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Denmark: A national study in the autumn of 2021.丹麦与 2021 年秋季 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫相关的因素:一项全国性研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jul;51(5):780-785. doi: 10.1177/14034948221144661. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
Mental wellbeing among Danish employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a longitudinal study on the role of industry and working environment.丹麦员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间的精神健康状况:一项关于行业和工作环境作用的纵向研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;32(6):871-876. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac150.
8
Decreasing mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study among Danes before and during the pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间心理健康状况下降:丹麦在大流行前后的一项纵向研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.035. Epub 2021 Sep 23.