Suppr超能文献

胸腔积液中的Gasdermin D是胸腔积液早期鉴别诊断的新型生物标志物。

Pleural Fluid GSDMD Is a Novel Biomarker for the Early Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Effusion.

作者信息

Li Pu, Shi Jing, Zhou Lijing, Wang Bo, Zhang Li Jun, Duan Liang, Hu Qin, Zhou Xiaolan, Yuan Yuan, Li Dandan, Chen Hong, Zhao Qing, Peng Xuemei, Chen Weixian

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 7;12:620322. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.620322. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Gasdermin D (GSDMD), controlling pyroptosis in cells, has multiple physiological functions. The diagnostic role of GSDMD in pleural effusion (PE) remains unknown.

METHODS

Sandwich ELISA kits that we developed were applied to measure the level of GSDMD for 335 patients with a definite cause of PE, including transudative PE, tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). The diagnostic accuracy of Light's criteria vs. the new marker GSDMD was performed. Clinical follow-up of 40 cases of PPE was conducted and divided into efficacy and non-efficacy groups according to the therapeutic outcome. Nucleated cells (NCs) in PE were isolated and further infected with bacteria to verify the cell source of GSDMD.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of GSDMD for the diagnosis of PE were 96% (sensitivity) and 94% (specificity). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that GSDMD can be an efficient biomarker for the differential diagnosis of transudative PE and other groups (all AUC > 0.973). Noteworthily, the highest AUC belonged to tuberculosis diagnosis of 0.990, and the cut-off value was 18.40 ng/mL. Moreover, the same cut-off value of PPE and MPE was 9.35 ng/mL. The combination of GSDMD, adenosine deaminase (ADA), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) will further improve the diagnostic efficiency especially between TPE and PPE (AUC = 0.968). The AUC of GSDMD change at day 4, which could predict the therapeutic effect at an early stage, was 0.945 ( < 0.0001). Interestingly, bacterial infection experiments further confirm that the pleural fluid GSDMD was expressed and secreted mainly by the NCs.

CONCLUSION

GSDMD and its combination are candidates as a potentially novel biomarker not only to separate PEs early and effectively, but also monitor disease progression.

摘要

目的

Gasdermin D(GSDMD)可调控细胞焦亡,具有多种生理功能。GSDMD在胸腔积液(PE)中的诊断作用尚不清楚。

方法

应用我们研发的夹心ELISA试剂盒检测335例明确病因的PE患者的GSDMD水平,包括漏出性PE、结核性胸腔积液(TPE)、类肺炎性胸腔积液(PPE)和恶性胸腔积液(MPE)。对Light标准与新标志物GSDMD的诊断准确性进行比较。对40例PPE患者进行临床随访,并根据治疗结果分为有效组和无效组。分离PE中的有核细胞(NCs),并进一步用细菌感染以验证GSDMD的细胞来源。

结果

GSDMD诊断PE的准确性为96%(敏感性)和94%(特异性)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线表明,GSDMD可作为鉴别漏出性PE与其他组别的有效生物标志物(所有AUC>0.973)。值得注意的是,最高的AUC值为0.990,用于结核病诊断,截断值为18.40 ng/mL。此外,PPE和MPE的相同截断值为9.35 ng/mL。GSDMD、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)联合使用将进一步提高诊断效率,尤其是在TPE和PPE之间(AUC = 0.968)。第4天GSDMD变化的AUC为0.945(<0.0001),可早期预测治疗效果。有趣的是,细菌感染实验进一步证实胸腔积液GSDMD主要由NCs表达和分泌。

结论

GSDMD及其联合检测有望成为一种潜在的新型生物标志物,不仅可早期有效区分PE,还可监测疾病进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f61/8215111/9dc22cae898a/fmicb-12-620322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验