Suppr超能文献

初次全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后的加速康复:系统评价。

Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):1938-1947. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.02169.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission.

RESULTS

Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

加速康复外科(ERAS)已越来越多地应用于减少成本、提高效率和优化手术患者的预后。本研究旨在系统地评估原发性择期全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)后 ERAS 对住院时间、总手术相关发病率和再入院的影响。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南以及 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册进行系统评价,并由其提供指导。从 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库的创建日期(1946 年为 MEDLINE,1974 年为 Embase;Cochrane 是多个数据库的组合,因此不报告标准的创建日期)开始检索,直到 2020 年 1 月 15 日。纳入比较成人患者接受原发性择期 THA 或 TKA 并接受 ERAS 或传统方案的前瞻性非随机队列研究和随机对照试验。排除门诊、非择期或翻修手术的文章。两名审查员独立评估偏倚风险并提取数据。主要结局是住院时间。次要结局包括总手术相关发病率和再入院率。

结果

共确定了 1018 条参考文献(1017 条通过电子搜索确定,1 条通过手动搜索确定),其中 9 项研究符合纳入标准。7789 名参与者的数据得到了报告,其中 2428 名接受 ERAS 治疗,5361 名接受传统治疗。由于存在中度至高度偏倚风险、ERAS 干预措施差异较大以及纳入研究在评估和报告结果方面方法不一致,因此进行了叙述性综合分析,而不是荟萃分析。ERAS 方案的依从性一致降低了住院时间。很少有研究表明总手术相关发病率降低,再入院率没有显著影响。

结论

ERAS 可能降低原发性择期 THA 和 TKA 后的住院时间,在选择更健康的患者人群中效果更为显著。我们发现对围手术期发病率或再入院率几乎没有影响。由于研究异质性和显著的偏倚风险,现有证据的质量有限。需要进一步进行高质量的研究来明确评估 ERAS 对全关节置换术的影响。

证据水平

治疗性 II 级。请参阅作者说明以获取完整的证据水平描述。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验