Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;50(1):61-71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005118.
To evaluate the functional outcome and health-related quality of life of in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors at 6 and 12 months.
A longitudinal cohort study.
Seven metropolitan hospitals in Australia.
Data were collected for hospitalized adults (≥ 18 yr) who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest, defined as "a period of unresponsiveness, with no observed respiratory effort and the commencement of external cardiac compressions."
None.
Prior to hospital discharge, patients were approached for consent to participate in 6-month and 12-month telephone interviews. Outcomes included the modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, Euro-Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level, return to work and hospital readmissions. Forty-eight patients (80%) consented to follow-up interviews. The mean age of participants was 67.2 (± 15.3) years, and 33 of 48 (68.8%) were male. Good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 3) was reported by 31 of 37 participants (83.8%) at 6 months and 30 of 33 (90.9%) at 12 months. The median Euro-Quality of Life-5D index value was 0.73 (0.33-0.84) at 6 months and 0.76 (0.47-0.88) at 12 months. The median Euro-Quality of Life-Visual Analogue Scale score at 6 months was 70 (55-80) and 75 (50-87.5) at 12 months. Problems in all Euro-Quality of Life-5D-5 L dimension were reported frequently at both time points. Hospital readmission was reported by 23 of 37 patients (62.2%) at 6 months and 16 of 33 (48.5%) at 12 months. Less than half of previously working participants had returned to work by 12 months.
The majority of in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors had a good functional outcome and health-related quality of life at 6 months, and this was largely unchanged at 12 months. Despite this, many reported problems with mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression. Return to work rates was low, and hospital readmissions were common.
评估住院心脏骤停幸存者在 6 个月和 12 个月时的功能结局和健康相关生活质量。
纵向队列研究。
澳大利亚 7 家大都市医院。
收集了患有住院成人(≥ 18 岁)的住院心脏骤停患者的数据,定义为“无反应期,无观察到呼吸努力,开始进行外部心脏按压。”
无。
在出院前,对同意接受 6 个月和 12 个月电话访谈的患者进行了前瞻性同意。结果包括改良 Rankin 量表、Barthel 指数、欧洲生活质量 5 维度 5 水平、重返工作岗位和住院再入院。48 名患者(80%)同意进行随访访谈。参与者的平均年龄为 67.2(±15.3)岁,48 名患者中有 33 名(68.8%)为男性。37 名参与者中有 31 名(83.8%)在 6 个月时报告功能结局良好(改良 Rankin 量表评分≤3),33 名参与者中有 30 名(90.9%)在 12 个月时报告功能结局良好。6 个月时欧洲生活质量-5 维度指数中位数为 0.73(0.33-0.84),12 个月时为 0.76(0.47-0.88)。6 个月时欧洲生活质量-视觉模拟量表评分为 70(55-80),12 个月时为 75(50-87.5)。在这两个时间点,所有欧洲生活质量-5 维度-5 水平维度的问题报告都很常见。37 名患者中有 23 名(62.2%)在 6 个月时和 33 名患者中有 16 名(48.5%)在 12 个月时报告了住院再入院。到 12 个月时,不到一半的以前工作的参与者已经重返工作岗位。
大多数住院心脏骤停幸存者在 6 个月时具有良好的功能结局和健康相关生活质量,在 12 个月时基本保持不变。尽管如此,许多患者报告在移动、自理、日常活动、疼痛和焦虑/抑郁方面存在问题。重返工作岗位的比例较低,住院再入院率较高。