Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease Laboratory, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253440. eCollection 2021.
Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment size distribution, and de novo assembly quality using both the Nextera XT and DNA Prep kits from Illumina. When performing whole-genome sequencing on Escherichia coli and where coverage bias is the main concern, the DNA Prep kit may provide higher quality results; though de novo assembly quality, tagmentation bias and GC content related bias are unlikely to improve. Based on these results, laboratories with existing workflows based on Nextera XT would see minor benefits in transitioning to the DNA Prep kit if they were primarily studying organisms with neutral GC content.
全基因组测序对于传染病研究的许多方面都是至关重要的。然而,覆盖范围的偏差和标签化、具有极端 GC 含量的基因组区域特征描述的困难等技术限制,在其使用中造成了重大障碍。Illumina 声称,最近发布的 DNA Prep 文库制备试剂盒(以前称为 Nextera Flex)克服了其中的一些限制。本研究旨在评估 Illumina 的 Nextera XT 和 DNA Prep 试剂盒在覆盖范围、标签化、GC 含量、平均片段大小分布和从头组装质量方面的偏差。当对大肠杆菌进行全基因组测序,并且覆盖范围偏差是主要关注点时,DNA Prep 试剂盒可能会提供更高质量的结果;尽管从头组装质量、标签化偏差和 GC 含量相关偏差不太可能得到改善。基于这些结果,如果实验室的现有工作流程基于 Nextera XT,并且主要研究中性 GC 含量的生物体,那么过渡到 DNA Prep 试剂盒可能只会带来较小的益处。