Experimental and Viral Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Experimental Immunology, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, WA, Australia.
Blood. 2022 Mar 3;139(9):1277-1288. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020010028.
The reactivation of viruses from latency after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) continues to represent a major clinical challenge requiring sophisticated monitoring strategies in the context of prophylactic and/or preemptive antiviral drugs that are associated with significant expense, toxicity and rates of failure. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the association of polyfunctional virus-specific T cells with protection from viral reactivation, affirmed by the ability of adoptively transferred virus-specific T cells to prevent and treat reactivation and disease. The roles of natural killer cells in early viral surveillance and of dendritic cells in priming of T cells have also been delineated. Most recently, a role for strain-specific humoral responses in preventing early cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has been demonstrated in preclinical models. Despite these advances, many unknowns remain: what are the critical innate and adaptive responses over time; are the origin (eg, recipient vs donor) and localization (eg, in parenchymal tissue vs lymphoid organs) of these responses important; how does graft-versus-host disease and the prevention and treatment thereof (eg, high-dose steroids) affect the functionality and relevance of a particular immune axis; do the immune parameters that control latency, reactivation, and dissemination differ; and what is the impact of new antiviral drugs on the development of enduring antiviral immunity. Thus, although antiviral drugs have provided major improvements over the past two decades, understanding the immunological paradigms underpinning protective antiviral immunity after SCT offers the potential to generate nontoxic, immune-based therapeutic approaches for lasting protection from viral reactivation.
异基因干细胞移植(SCT)后病毒从潜伏状态重新激活仍然是一个主要的临床挑战,需要在预防性和/或抢先性抗病毒药物的背景下采用复杂的监测策略,这些药物与重大的费用、毒性和失败率有关。越来越多的证据表明,多功能病毒特异性 T 细胞与防止病毒重新激活有关,这一事实得到了以下事实的证实:即特异性病毒 T 细胞的过继转移可以预防和治疗重新激活和疾病。自然杀伤细胞在早期病毒监测中的作用以及树突状细胞在 T 细胞启动中的作用也已被阐明。最近,在临床前模型中已经证明了针对特定毒株的体液反应在预防早期巨细胞病毒(CMV)重新激活中的作用。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍有许多未知因素:随着时间的推移,哪些是关键的先天和适应性反应;这些反应的起源(例如,受者与供者)和定位(例如,实质组织与淋巴器官)是否重要;移植物抗宿主病及其预防和治疗(例如,大剂量类固醇)如何影响特定免疫轴的功能和相关性;控制潜伏期、重新激活和传播的免疫参数是否不同;新型抗病毒药物对持久抗病毒免疫的发展有何影响。因此,尽管抗病毒药物在过去二十年中提供了重大改进,但了解 SCT 后保护性抗病毒免疫的免疫学范式有可能为持久防止病毒重新激活提供非毒性、基于免疫的治疗方法。