Suppr超能文献

药师主导的干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的效果:INSPIRA 试点整群随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhalation technique for asthma and COPD patients: The INSPIRA pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaude - National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR/IS-ANF), Lisbon, Portugal.

Centre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaude - National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR/IS-ANF), Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2021 Aug-Sep;185:106507. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106507. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Asthma and COPD are leading causes of disability-adjusted life-years worldwide representing a huge burden on the health system and among patients. One of the reasons for the lack of disease control is poor inhalation technique, with impact on quality of life and symptom control.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a community pharmacist-led educational intervention on asthma and COPD patients' inhalation technique.

METHODS

The INspira study is a 6-month pilot cluster randomized controlled trial, conducted in community pharmacies of Portugal, enrolling adults aged 18 years or older, with a self-reported diagnosis of asthma or COPD and on inhaled therapy. Pharmacies were randomly allocated to Intervention or Control group. Intervention focused mainly on inhalation technique education via demonstration and repetition. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients scoring 100% in at least one inhaler.

RESULTS

From January to November 2019, 48 pharmacies recruited 201 asthma and COPD patients, of which 132 completed the 6-month follow-up. At the end of follow-up, the odds of intervention group patients score 100% compared to the control group were 5.63 (95% CI, [2.21; 14.35]) in all inhalers in use and 6.77 (95% CI, [2.52; 18.20]) considering at least one inhaler. Intervention group patients reported having a significantly lower number of scheduled appointments compared with the control group (OR = 0.17; 95% CI, [0.037; 0.79]; p = 0.0135). No other significant differences were found between groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggested that pharmacist interventions can improve patients' inhalation technique, with possible positive impact in healthcare resource use.

摘要

简介

哮喘和 COPD 是全球导致伤残调整生命年的主要原因,给卫生系统和患者带来了巨大负担。疾病控制不佳的原因之一是吸入技术差,这会影响生活质量和症状控制。

目的

评估社区药剂师主导的教育干预对哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入技术的效果。

方法

INspira 研究是一项为期 6 个月的试点群随机对照试验,在葡萄牙的社区药房进行,纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上、自我报告患有哮喘或 COPD 且正在接受吸入治疗的成年人。药房被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预主要侧重于通过演示和重复来进行吸入技术教育。主要结局是至少有 1 种吸入器评分达到 100%的患者比例。

结果

2019 年 1 月至 11 月,48 家药房招募了 201 名哮喘和 COPD 患者,其中 132 名完成了 6 个月的随访。在随访结束时,与对照组相比,干预组患者所有使用的吸入器评分达到 100%的可能性为 5.63(95%CI,[2.21;14.35]),考虑到至少使用 1 种吸入器的可能性为 6.77(95%CI,[2.52;18.20])。干预组患者报告与对照组相比,预约次数明显减少(OR=0.17;95%CI,[0.037;0.79];p=0.0135)。两组之间没有发现其他显著差异。

结论

这项试点研究表明,药剂师的干预措施可以改善患者的吸入技术,可能对医疗保健资源的利用产生积极影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验