Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11683-9.
Despite recent advances in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), patients still experience suboptimal disease control largely due to medication non-adherence and inappropriate use of inhaler. This study evaluates the impact of pharmacist-led intervention in medication adherence and inhaler usage on asthma and COPD control among out-patients attending the premier tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
A quasi-experimental study carried-out among eligible out-patients attending pulmonology clinic of University College Hospital, Ibadan. Baseline questionnaire explored medication adherence using a comprehensive-medication-adherence-assessment-scale (CMAAS-12) developed by the study co-investigators, use of pressurized-metered-dose (pMDI) and Diskus inhalers, as well as asthma/COPD control using validated asthma control test (ACT) and COPD assessment test (CAT). Subsequently, patients were allocated into control (n = 65) or intervention group (n = 65) using odd or even number. Intervention group received 2-month follow-up educational and/or cognitive-behavioural interventions to resolve identified adherence barriers, while control group continued with traditional care. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Wilcoxon-signed-ranked tests were used for analysis at p < 0.05.
Overall, patients with optimal adherence were 11(18.6%) and 16(27.1%), p = 0.132 (control), but 20(33.3%) and 38(63.3%), p < 0.001 (intervention) at baseline and post-baseline, respectively. Specifically, in the intervention group, the identified adherence barriers at baseline were summarized into knowledge (120;40.4%), practical (115;38.7%) and attitudinal (62;20.9%). Patients with correct use of pMDI were 11(21.6%) baseline and 19(36.5%) post-baseline, p = 0.011 (control), but 13(22.8%) and 46(80.7%) respectively, p < 0.001 (intervention). Correct use of Diskus inhaler were 5(50.0%) and 4(40.0%), p = 0.157 (control), but 7(35.0%) and 14(70.0%), p = 0.025 (intervention) at baseline and post-baseline, respectively. Patients with 'well-controlled asthma' were 25(44.6%) and 26 (47.3%), p = 0.025 (control), but 18(35.3%) and 32(60.4%), p < 0.001 (intervention) at baseline and post-baseline, respectively. The COPD-specific health status indicated that 0(0.0%) and 1(14.3%), p = 0.059 (control), but 0(0.0%) and 7(50.0%), p < 0.001 (intervention) at baseline and post-baseline, respectively, belonged to 'low COPD impact'.
Pharmacist-led intervention significantly enhanced medication adherence and appropriate use of inhaler among the intervention cohort, with subsequent significant improvement in asthma control and reduced COPD impact compared with the control group. This underscores the need for active involvement of pharmacists in collaborative management of patients with chronic respiratory diseases in clinical practice.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06417931. Retrospectively-registered.
尽管在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的管理方面取得了一些进展,但由于药物依从性差和吸入器使用不当,患者的疾病控制仍然不理想。本研究评估了药剂师主导的干预措施对尼日利亚一家顶级 tertiary 医院门诊患者的哮喘和 COPD 控制中药物依从性和吸入器使用的影响。
在伊巴丹大学教学医院的肺病科门诊进行了一项准实验研究。基线问卷调查使用由研究合作研究者开发的综合药物依从性评估量表(CMAAS-12)评估药物依从性,使用压力计量剂量(pMDI)和 Diskus 吸入器,以及使用经过验证的哮喘控制测试(ACT)和 COPD 评估测试(CAT)评估哮喘/COPD 控制。随后,使用奇数或偶数将患者分配到对照组(n=65)或干预组(n=65)。干预组接受为期 2 个月的随访教育和/或认知行为干预,以解决确定的依从性障碍,而对照组继续接受传统护理。p<0.05 时使用描述性统计、卡方检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行分析。
总体而言,基线时药物依从性良好的患者分别为 11(18.6%)和 16(27.1%),p=0.132(对照组),但分别为 20(33.3%)和 38(63.3%),p<0.001(干预组)在基线和基线后。具体来说,在干预组中,基线时确定的依从性障碍总结为知识(120;40.4%)、实践(115;38.7%)和态度(62;20.9%)。正确使用 pMDI 的患者分别为 11(21.6%)和 19(36.5%),p=0.011(对照组),但分别为 13(22.8%)和 46(80.7%),p<0.001(干预组)。正确使用 Diskus 吸入器的患者分别为 5(50.0%)和 4(40.0%),p=0.157(对照组),但分别为 7(35.0%)和 14(70.0%),p=0.025(干预组)在基线和基线后。“哮喘控制良好”的患者分别为 25(44.6%)和 26(47.3%),p=0.025(对照组),但分别为 18(35.3%)和 32(60.4%),p<0.001(干预组)在基线和基线后。COPD 特异性健康状况表明,基线时分别有 0(0.0%)和 1(14.3%),p=0.059(对照组),但基线时分别有 0(0.0%)和 7(50.0%),p<0.001(干预组)。
药剂师主导的干预显著提高了干预组患者的药物依从性和吸入器的正确使用,与对照组相比,哮喘控制显著改善,COPD 影响降低。这强调了药剂师在临床实践中积极参与慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的联合管理的必要性。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT06417931。回顾性注册。