Fralick Michael, Schneeweiss Sebastian, Redelmeier Donald A, Razak Fahad, Gomes Tara, Patorno Elisabetta
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sinai Health, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Oct;23(10):2320-2328. doi: 10.1111/dom.14474. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients compared with metformin.
We conducted a cohort study of US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had not filled a prescription for a diabetes medication in the preceding year. We then identified patients who newly filled a prescription for an SGLT2 inhibitor or metformin between 2013 and 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure, myocardial infarction or stroke. Safety outcomes included hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, genital infection, lactic acidosis and acute kidney injury. After 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching, proportional hazards models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
We identified 9964 individuals newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor who were PS-matched to 9964 individuals newly prescribed metformin. The mean age was 54 years, 52% were women, and the duration of follow-up was 213 days for metformin and 147 days for SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary outcome occurred in 54 patients (7.2 events per 1000 person-years) who received an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared to 84 patients (8.5 per 1000 person-years) who received metformin (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.58, 1.15). Similar results (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69, 1.09) were observed in an analysis with longer follow-up (ie, approximately 600 days). The rates of genital infection (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.87, 2.78) and diabetic ketoacidosis (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.92, 2.70) were higher for patients prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor compared to metformin, while the rates of acute kidney injury (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.60, 1.47) or hypoglycaemia (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48, 1.42) were not.
We observed a numerically lower rate of short-/mid-term cardiovascular events for patients newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor compared to metformin, albeit with wide CIs that include the possibility of a null effect. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a higher rate of genital infection and diabetic ketoacidosis. Larger cohort studies and long-term clinical trials powered to assess cardiovascular events are necessary to understand the risk-benefit profile of SGLT2 inhibitors as first-line therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
评估与二甲双胍相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂在初治患者中的有效性和安全性。
我们对美国2型糖尿病成年患者进行了一项队列研究,这些患者在前一年未开具过糖尿病药物处方。然后,我们确定了2013年至2018年间新开具SGLT2抑制剂或二甲双胍处方的患者。主要结局是心力衰竭、心肌梗死或中风的复合结局。安全性结局包括低血糖、糖尿病酮症酸中毒、生殖器感染、乳酸酸中毒和急性肾损伤。在1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配后,采用比例风险模型来估计风险比(HRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。
我们确定了9964名新开具SGLT2抑制剂处方的个体,他们与9964名新开具二甲双胍处方的个体进行了PS匹配。平均年龄为54岁,52%为女性,二甲双胍组的随访时间为213天,SGLT2抑制剂组为147天。接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗的54例患者(每1000人年发生7.2例事件)出现了主要结局,而接受二甲双胍治疗的84例患者(每1000人年发生8.5例)出现了主要结局(HR 0.82,95%CI 0.58,1.15)。在更长随访时间(即约600天)的分析中观察到了类似结果(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.69,1.09)。与二甲双胍相比,开具SGLT2抑制剂处方的患者生殖器感染率(HR 2.28,95%CI 1.87,2.78)和糖尿病酮症酸中毒率(HR 1.58,95%CI 0.92,2.70)更高,而急性肾损伤率(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.60,1.47)或低血糖率(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.48,1.42)则没有差异。
我们观察到,新开具SGLT2抑制剂处方的患者短期/中期心血管事件发生率在数值上低于二甲双胍,尽管置信区间较宽,包括无效应的可能性。SGLT2抑制剂与生殖器感染和糖尿病酮症酸中毒的发生率较高相关。需要进行更大规模的队列研究和有足够能力评估心血管事件的长期临床试验,以了解SGLT2抑制剂作为成人2型糖尿病一线治疗的风险效益概况。