Canberra Endometriosis Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ACT Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Department of Pediatrics, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Australian National University, College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022 Feb;35(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
To validate the Period ImPact and Pain Assessment (PIPPA) self-screening tool for menstrual disturbance in teenagers.
Cross-sectional study.
Three senior high schools in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia.
A total of 1066 girls between 15 and 19 years of age.
A quantitative paper survey collected self-reports of menstrual bleeding patterns, typical and atypical symptoms, morbidities, and interference with daily activities. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to examine associations between PIPPA questions. Generalized linear models compared total score and subscores by validation criteria: pain, school absence, and body mass index (BMI). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictiveness of menstrual disturbance indicators by total PIPPA score.
Reports of pain, interference, and concern within the PIPPA items and between both the MDOT and PIPPA questionnaires were significantly correlated (P < .0001). The indicator "missing school" was highly associated (P < .0001) with pain and interference. Obesity (BMI ≥30) was associated with higher PIPPA scores, as was underweight (BMI≤18.4). Where 0 = no disturbance, 5 = high disturbance, aggregated PIPPA scores found 75% scoring 0-2 (out of 5) and 25% scoring 3-5 (257/1037). High scores of 4 or 5 (out of 5) were 7% (72/1037) and 3.7% (38/1037), respectively.
PIPPA is a valid screening tool for pain-related menstrual disturbance that affects functioning in young women. PIPPA subdomains of pain/interference have good validity relative to indicators of pain and interference and are responsive to age, BMI, and school absence differences.
验证青少年经期紊乱的 Period ImPact and Pain Assessment(PIPPA)自我筛查工具。
横断面研究。
澳大利亚首都领地(ACT)的三所高中。
共 1066 名 15 至 19 岁的女孩。
通过定量纸质问卷收集月经出血模式、典型和非典型症状、发病率以及对日常活动的干扰的自我报告。多元对应分析用于检查 PIPPA 问题之间的关联。广义线性模型根据验证标准比较总评分和子评分:疼痛、缺课和体重指数(BMI)。接收者操作特征曲线用于评估总 PIPPA 评分的月经紊乱指标的预测能力。
PIPPA 项目中的疼痛、干扰和担忧以及 MDOT 和 PIPPA 问卷之间的报告显著相关(P <.0001)。“缺课”指标与疼痛和干扰高度相关(P <.0001)。肥胖(BMI≥30)与较高的 PIPPA 评分相关,而体重不足(BMI≤18.4)也是如此。其中 0=无紊乱,5=高度紊乱,聚合的 PIPPA 评分发现 75%的评分为 0-2(5 分中的 0-2 分),25%的评分为 3-5(1037 分中的 257 分)。4 分或 5 分(5 分中的 4-5 分)的高分分别为 7%(1037 分中的 72 分)和 3.7%(1037 分中的 38 分)。
PIPPA 是一种有效的疼痛相关经期紊乱筛查工具,影响年轻女性的功能。PIPPA 的疼痛/干扰子域具有良好的有效性,与疼痛和干扰指标相对应,并且对年龄、BMI 和缺课差异敏感。