Suppr超能文献

无排卵周期与正常排卵周期中的经痛——SARS-CoV-2大流行每日数据以及经痛与无排卵的荟萃分析

Menstrual Cramps in Anovulatory versus Normally Ovulatory Cycles - SARS-COV-2 Pandemic Daily Data Plus a Meta-Analysis of Cramps and Anovulation.

作者信息

Mann Gurleen, Shirin Sonia, Bann Sewon, Yong Paul J, Kalidasan Dharani, Goshtasebi Azita, Prior Jerilynn C

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 10;17:2363-2374. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S457484. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

It is asserted that primary dysmenorrhea/menstrual cramps only occur in ovulatory menstrual cycles. Our first objective was to present detailed menstrual cramps information in normally ovulatory versus anovulatory cycles from a single-cycle cohort study during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Secondly, we reviewed the literature for cohort studies documenting both menstrual cramps and ovulation.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The Menstruation and Ovulation Study 2 recruited 108 women ages 19-35 years to a prospective, observational single-cycle study, recording cramps daily (0-4 scale) in the Menstrual Cycle Diary© and assessing normal ovulation (luteal length ≥10 days) by the validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (Mean Temperature Method). We searched databases for « primary dysmenorrhea » / » menstrual cramps »; « menstrual cycles »; « anovulation », finding four valid publications.

RESULTS

In 75 women/cycles during the Pandemic, mean age was 28.5, body mass index 23.5, and higher education (16 years); 40 normally ovulatory and 35 anovulatory cycles had similar lengths (29.5-30.0 days), respectively (0.571). However, anovulatory cycles recorded significantly worse menstrual cramps versus normally ovulatory cycles; anovulatory median intensity was 1.9 versus 1.6, and Cramp Score was 8 versus 6 in normally ovulatory cycles (=0.017). Four publications in 273 women (991 cycles) showed cramps in both anovulatory and ovulatory cycles; three were in adolescent/young adult women, one of which documented a significantly greater percentage of cramps in ovulatory cycles. The 694 cycles in premenopausal women (20-41 years) showed similar percentages of symptomatic cramps in cycles of both ovulatory types. Meta-analysis documented significantly higher cramp prevalence in ovulatory cycles (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.31, 3.37; =0.002).

CONCLUSION

This is the first documentation of more intense and frequent cramps in anovulatory cycles. However, meta-analysis showing the presence of symptomatic cramps in both ovulatory and anovulatory cycles documented they were twice as prevalent in ovulatory menstrual cycles.

摘要

目的

有人认为原发性痛经/月经痉挛仅发生在有排卵的月经周期中。我们的首要目标是在一项关于2019冠状病毒病大流行期间单周期队列研究中,呈现正常排卵周期与无排卵周期中详细的月经痉挛信息。其次,我们检索了有关记录月经痉挛和排卵情况的队列研究的文献。

参与者与方法

月经与排卵研究2招募了108名年龄在19至35岁之间的女性参与一项前瞻性观察性单周期研究,她们在《月经周期日记》中每天记录痉挛情况(0至4级),并通过经过验证的定量基础体温(平均体温法)评估正常排卵情况(黄体期长度≥10天)。我们在数据库中搜索了“原发性痛经”/“月经痉挛”;“月经周期”;“无排卵”,共找到4篇有效出版物。

结果

在大流行期间的75名女性/周期中,平均年龄为28.5岁,体重指数为23.5,且接受高等教育(16年);40个正常排卵周期和35个无排卵周期的长度相似(分别为29.5至30.0天)(P = 0.571)。然而,与正常排卵周期相比,无排卵周期记录的月经痉挛情况明显更严重;无排卵周期的中位数强度为1.9,而正常排卵周期为1.6,正常排卵周期的痉挛评分是6分,无排卵周期是8分(P = 0.017)。273名女性(991个周期)的4篇出版物显示,无排卵周期和排卵周期均出现痉挛;3篇针对青少年/年轻成年女性,其中一篇记录了排卵周期中痉挛发生率明显更高。绝经前女性(20至41岁)的694个周期显示,两种排卵类型的周期中出现症状性痉挛的百分比相似。荟萃分析表明,排卵周期中痉挛的患病率显著更高(比值比2.10;95%置信区间1.31,3.37;P = 0.002)。

结论

这是首次记录到无排卵周期中痉挛更强烈且更频繁。然而,荟萃分析表明,排卵周期和无排卵周期中均存在症状性痉挛,且记录显示排卵性月经周期中痉挛的患病率是无排卵周期的两倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee16/11246634/f7f36a8e7408/JPR-17-2363-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验