Çağa Daniel, Brennan Anne-Maria, Eaton Kenneth
General Dental Practitioner and MSc Student, Birmingham, UK.
Director of Graduate Studies, Lecturer in Professional Practice, Centre for Professional Practice, Medway Campus, University of Kent, Medway Maritime, Kent, ME4 4AG, UK.
Br Dent J. 2021 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3083-z.
Aims To investigate the reported use of rubber dam isolation by UK general dental practitioners (GDPs), utilising an internet-mediated (SurveyMonkey) questionnaire reporting the demographic profile of respondents and the attitudes and factors influencing rubber dam use.Methods A piloted questionnaire was distributed to a random sample of GDPs in a private Facebook group, investigating respondent demographics, clinical applications, and attitudes towards and factors influencing rubber dam use. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics along with chi-squared and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests.Results The response rate was 61%, with 403 valid completed questionnaires. Of these, 218 (54%) were female and 185 (46%) were male, with an age range of 23-72 years. Most of them (248; 62%) worked in mixed practices. The majority agreed that rubber dam aids placement of posterior restorations (311; 78%), provides clearer access (308; 76%), enables a higher clinical standard (355; 89%) and increases restoration longevity (257; 65%). Most agreed that proper isolation for root canal/operative procedures cannot be achieved without rubber dam use (329; 82%). Respondents disagreed with the following statements: root canal therapy completed without rubber dam isolation is as successful as those completed using rubber dam (338; 85%), rubber dam is difficult to apply (292; 73%) and rubber dam is disliked by patients (257; 64%). Respondents agreed that rubber dam use is influenced by clinical setting (259; 64%), procedure (390; 97%), choice of material being placed (382; 95%) and ease of application (337; 84%). Furthermore, 218 (54%) of the respondents expressed an interest in further training in rubber dam use.Conclusions This study provides greater insight into the attitudes and factors influencing rubber dam use, while demonstrating an interest in further training.
目的 通过互联网介导(SurveyMonkey)的问卷调查,调查英国普通牙科从业者(GDPs)使用橡皮障隔离的情况,报告受访者的人口统计学特征以及影响橡皮障使用的态度和因素。方法 在一个私人Facebook群组中,向GDPs的随机样本发放一份经过预测试的问卷,调查受访者的人口统计学特征、临床应用以及对橡皮障使用的态度和影响因素。使用描述性统计以及卡方检验和两两比较的曼-惠特尼U检验对数据进行分析。结果 回复率为61%,共收到403份有效完整问卷。其中,女性218人(54%),男性185人(46%),年龄范围为23至72岁。他们中的大多数(248人;62%)在综合诊所工作。大多数人同意橡皮障有助于后牙修复体的放置(311人;78%),提供更清晰的操作视野(308人;76%),能达到更高的临床标准(355人;89%)并延长修复体寿命(257人;65%)。大多数人同意如果不使用橡皮障,根管治疗/手术操作无法实现适当的隔离(329人;82%)。受访者不同意以下陈述:不使用橡皮障隔离完成的根管治疗与使用橡皮障完成的一样成功(338人;85%),橡皮障难以应用(292人;73%)以及患者不喜欢橡皮障(257人;64%)。受访者同意橡皮障的使用受临床环境(259人;64%)、操作程序(390人;97%)、所放置材料的选择(382人;95%)和应用的难易程度(337人;84%)影响。此外,218名(54%)受访者表示有兴趣接受橡皮障使用方面的进一步培训。结论 本研究更深入地了解了影响橡皮障使用的态度和因素,同时表明了对进一步培训的兴趣。