Suppr超能文献

英国最初是如何应对全国性感染危机的:1578年《瘟疫令》的实施与2020年3月至5月新冠疫情封锁措施的比较

How England first managed a national infection crisis: Implementation of the Plague Orders of 1578 compared with COVID-19 Lockdown March to May 2020.

作者信息

Tobyn Graeme

机构信息

School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;3(1):100111. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100111. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in the UK have parallels with the first ever national management of epidemic infection in England, the Plague Orders of 1578. Combining historical research of the Tudor and Stuart periods with information sources and broadcast news as the epidemic in England unfolds in real time during lockdown, the areas of official guidance, epidemiology, social distancing and quarantine, financing measures, the national health service and fake news are compared. Then as now, limits on freedom of movement and congregation, social distancing and quarantine measures were applied for the sake of preserving life, loss of livelihood ameliorated by government loans and inconvenient opinions suppressed, and these suggest a commonality of organised responses to mass infection across times. Increased danger in certain necessary occupations and flight to second homes by the rich have been observed, health inequities uncovered and restrictions on being with the dying and burying the dead enforced. Wholly unprecedented in comparison with the past, when the wealthiest in a parish were taxed to pay for measures against plague, is the quarantining of the whole society and the financial package for workers on furlough to avoid mass unemployment. In the new normal after lockdown, people should be given more credit for sophisticated understanding than was allowed in past centuries, when fear and punishment coerced the majority to conform, and be allowed access to relevant information which will influence decisions about national and community life going forward after lockdown.

摘要

当前英国的新冠疫情大流行及封锁措施,与英国首次对疫情感染进行全国性管理的情况——即1578年的《瘟疫令》——存在相似之处。将都铎王朝和斯图亚特王朝时期的历史研究与信息来源及广播新闻相结合,随着英国在封锁期间疫情实时发展,对官方指导、流行病学、社交距离与隔离、融资措施、国民医疗服务体系以及假新闻等领域进行了比较。彼时与当下一样,为了保护生命,实施了行动自由和集会限制、社交距离和隔离措施,政府贷款缓解了生计损失,不便的观点受到压制,这些都表明不同时期对大规模感染的有组织应对存在共性。人们观察到某些必要职业的危险增加,富人逃往第二居所,发现了健康不平等现象,并且实施了与垂死者相处及埋葬死者的限制。与过去相比,完全前所未有的是对整个社会进行隔离以及为休假工人提供财政方案以避免大规模失业,而在过去,教区中最富有的人会被征税以支付抗疫措施费用。在封锁后的新常态下,人们应被给予比过去几个世纪更多的信任,当时恐惧和惩罚迫使大多数人服从,应允许人们获取相关信息,这些信息将影响封锁后国家和社区未来生活的决策。

相似文献

2
Spring in London with Covid-19: a personal view.
Med Leg J. 2020 Jul;88(2):57-64. doi: 10.1177/0025817220923692. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Greek population: Suicidal ideation during the first and second lockdown.
Psychiatriki. 2021 Dec 20;32(4):267-270. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.041. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Shutt up: bubonic plague and quarantine in early modern England.
J Soc Hist. 2012;45(3):809-34. doi: 10.1093/jsh/shr114.
6
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
7
Association of tiered restrictions and a second lockdown with COVID-19 deaths and hospital admissions in England: a modelling study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):482-492. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30984-1. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring transmissibility and mortality of COVID-19 in Europe.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:311-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.050. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
2
Plague: history and contemporary analysis.
J Infect. 2013 Jan;66(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
3
Shutt up: bubonic plague and quarantine in early modern England.
J Soc Hist. 2012;45(3):809-34. doi: 10.1093/jsh/shr114.
6
The Eyam plague revisited: did the village isolation change transmission from fleas to pulmonary?
Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(5):911-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.028.
7
The worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London.
Postgrad Med J. 2004 Jan;80(939):41-4. doi: 10.1136/pmj.2003.015933.
8
THE PERSONNEL AND PRACTICE OF MEDICINE IN TUDOR AND STUART ENGLAND. II. LONDON.
Med Hist. 1964 Jul;8(3):217-34. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300029604.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验