Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06226-0.
Current clinical guidelines recommend treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a minority of cases, but there are relatively scarce data on evolution or progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis in cases of chronic HBV (CHB) that do not meet treatment criteria. We aimed to assess the impact of TDF on liver disease, and the risk of renal impairment in treated CHB patients in comparison to untreated patients.
We studied a longitudinal ethnically diverse CHB cohort in the UK attending out-patient clinics between 2005 and 2018. We examined TDF treatment (vs. untreated) as the main exposure, with HBV DNA viral load (VL), ALT, elastography scores and eGFR as the main outcomes, using paired tests and mixed effects model for longitudinal measurements. Additionally, decline of eGFR during follow-up was quantified within individuals by thresholds based on clinical guidelines. Baseline was defined as treatment initiation for TDF group and the beginning of clinical follow-up for untreated group respectively.
We included 206 adults (60 on TDF, 146 untreated), with a median ± IQR follow-up duration of 3.3 ± 2.8 years. The TDF group was significantly older (median age 39 vs. 35 years, p = 0.004) and more likely to be male (63% vs. 47%, p = 0.04) compared to the untreated group. Baseline difference between TDF and untreated groups reflected treatment eligibility criteria. As expected, VL and ALT declined significantly over time in TDF-treated patients. Elastography scores normalised during treatment in the TDF group reflecting regression of inflammation and/or fibrosis. However, 6/81 (7.4%) of untreated patients had a progression of fibrosis stage from F0-F1 to F2 or F3. There was no evidence of difference in rates or incidence of renal impairment during follow-up in the TDF vs. untreated group.
Risk of liver inflammation and fibrosis may be raised in untreated patients compared to those receiving TDF, and TDF may benefit a larger percentage of the CHB population.
目前的临床指南建议对少数慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者进行治疗,但对于不符合治疗标准的慢性 HBV(CHB)患者,关于肝脏炎症和纤维化的演变或进展的数据相对较少。我们旨在评估替诺福韦酯(TDF)对治疗和未治疗的 CHB 患者的肝病和肾功能损害风险的影响。
我们在 2005 年至 2018 年间对英国的一个纵向种族多样化的 CHB 队列进行了研究。我们将 TDF 治疗(与未治疗相比)作为主要暴露因素,将 HBV DNA 病毒载量(VL)、ALT、弹性成像评分和 eGFR 作为主要结果,使用配对检验和混合效应模型进行纵向测量。此外,通过基于临床指南的阈值,在个体内量化了随访期间 eGFR 的下降。基线定义为 TDF 组的治疗开始和未治疗组的临床随访开始。
我们纳入了 206 名成年人(60 名接受 TDF 治疗,146 名未接受治疗),中位随访时间为 3.3±2.8 年。TDF 组的年龄明显较大(中位数 39 岁比 35 岁,p=0.004),男性比例更高(63%比 47%,p=0.04)。TDF 组和未治疗组之间的基线差异反映了治疗的合格标准。如预期的那样,TDF 治疗患者的 VL 和 ALT 随时间显著下降。在 TDF 治疗组,弹性成像评分在治疗期间正常化,反映了炎症和/或纤维化的消退。然而,6/81(7.4%)名未治疗的患者纤维化分期从 F0-F1 进展为 F2 或 F3。在 TDF 组与未治疗组之间,随访期间肾功能损害的发生率或发病率没有差异。
与接受 TDF 治疗的患者相比,未治疗的患者肝脏炎症和纤维化的风险可能更高,TDF 可能使更大比例的 CHB 人群受益。