Department of Acute Care Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
Advanced Trauma Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun 26;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00377-w.
A hybrid emergency room (ER) is defined as an emergency unit with four functions-performing resuscitation, computed tomography (CT), surgery, and angiography. However, the safety and efficacy of performing CT in a hybrid ER are unclear in primary surveys. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical effects of hybrid ERs.
This retrospective observational study used data from the Shimane University Hospital Trauma Database from January 2016 to February 2019. Hospitalized patients with severe trauma and an injury severity score of ≥ 16 were divided into the non-hybrid ER group (n = 134) and the hybrid ER group (n = 145). The time from arrival to CT and interventions and the number of in-hospital survivors, preventable trauma deaths (PTD), and unexpected survivors (US) were assessed in both groups. Further, the amount of blood transfused was compared between the groups using propensity score matching.
The time from arrival to CT and interventions was significantly reduced in the hybrid ER group compared to that in the non-hybrid ER group (25 vs. 6 min; p < 0.0001 and 101 vs. 41 min; p = 0.0007, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rate of in-hospital survivors (96.9% vs. 96.3%; p = 0.770), PTD (0% vs. 0%), and US (9.0 vs. 6.2%; p = 0.497) between the groups. The amount of blood transfused was significantly lower in the hybrid ER group than in the non-hybrid ER group (whole blood 14 vs. 8, p = 0.004; red blood cell 6 vs. 2, p = 0.012; fresh frozen plasma 9 vs. 6, p = 0.021). This difference was maintained after propensity score matching (whole blood 28 [10-54] vs. 6 [4-16.5], p = 0.015; RBC 8 [2.75-26.5] vs. 2 [0-8.5], p = 0.020, 18 [5.5-27] vs. 6 [3.5-7.5], p = 0.057).
The study results suggest that trauma treatment in a hybrid ER is as safe as conventional treatment performed in a non-hybrid ER. Further, hybrid ERs, which can reduce the time for trauma surveys and treatment, do not require patient transfer and can reduce the amount of blood transfused during resuscitation.
杂交急诊室(ER)定义为具有四项功能的急诊单位-进行复苏、计算机断层扫描(CT)、手术和血管造影。然而,在初步检查中,在杂交 ER 中进行 CT 的安全性和疗效尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估杂交 ER 的安全性和临床效果。
本回顾性观察性研究使用了从 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月岛根大学医院创伤数据库的数据。将创伤严重程度评分≥16 的严重创伤住院患者分为非杂交 ER 组(n=134)和杂交 ER 组(n=145)。评估两组患者从到达到 CT 和干预的时间,以及院内幸存者、可预防创伤死亡(PTD)和意外幸存者(US)的数量。此外,使用倾向评分匹配比较两组之间的输血量。
与非杂交 ER 组相比,杂交 ER 组从到达到 CT 和干预的时间明显缩短(25 分钟对 6 分钟;p<0.0001 和 101 分钟对 41 分钟;p=0.0007)。两组患者的院内幸存者(96.9%对 96.3%;p=0.770)、PTD(0%对 0%)和 US(9.0%对 6.2%;p=0.497)率无显著差异。杂交 ER 组的输血量明显低于非杂交 ER 组(全血 14 对 8,p=0.004;红细胞 6 对 2,p=0.012;新鲜冷冻血浆 9 对 6,p=0.021)。在倾向评分匹配后,这一差异仍然存在(全血 28[10-54]对 6[4-16.5],p=0.015;红细胞 8[2.75-26.5]对 2[0-8.5],p=0.020,18[5.5-27]对 6[3.5-7.5],p=0.057)。
研究结果表明,杂交 ER 中的创伤治疗与非杂交 ER 中的常规治疗一样安全。此外,杂交 ER 可以缩短创伤检查和治疗的时间,不需要患者转院,并且可以减少复苏期间的输血量。