Suppr超能文献

安非他命和托莫西汀对冲动行为和选择的影响对比。

Contrasting effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on measures of impulsive action and choice.

机构信息

InterVivo Solutions Inc., Toronto, ON M5A 4K2, Canada; Dept. Pharmacology & Toxicology, U. Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 4K2, Canada.

InterVivo Solutions Inc., Toronto, ON M5A 4K2, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 Aug;207:173220. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173220. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

Abstract

Amphetamine (AMP) and atomoxetine (ATX) represent two of the most widely studied drug treatments used in the investigation of impulsive behaviour. While both drugs have relatively well defined effects in tests designed to investigate impulsive action (e.g. 5-choice task; 5-CSRTT), the effects of both drugs in tests of impulsive choice (e.g. delay discounting) are less consistent. In the present study both AMP and ATX were tested in a rodent gambling task (rGT) and delay discounting in rats separately trained to either an ascending or descending delay schedule. Effects of both drugs were compared to measures of impulsive action (premature (PREM) responses) and perseverative (PSV) responses measured in the 5-choice and rGT tasks. Consistent with previous studies, AMP (0.1-1 mg/kg) increased both PREM and PSV responses, and ATX (0.5-2 mg/kg) reduced both measures in the 5-choice and rGT tasks. At equivalent doses ATX had no reliable effect on choice behaviour in either the rGT or delay discounting suggesting a null effect of this drug on impulsive choice and risky decision making. The effects of AMP were more complex, with a subtle shift in preference to a low risk (P1) choice in the rGT, and an effect on discounting that was unrelated to reinforcer value, but instead dependent on delay sequence and baseline choice preference. One aspect to these outcomes is to highlight the importance of multiple methodological factors when assessing drug effects on complex behaviours such as impulsive choice, and question what are the most appropriate test conditions under which to examine these drugs on discounting.

摘要

安非他命 (AMP) 和托莫西汀 (ATX) 是两种研究最为广泛的用于研究冲动行为的药物治疗方法。虽然这两种药物在设计用于研究冲动行为的测试中(例如 5 选择任务;5-CSRTT)具有相对明确的作用,但在冲动选择测试(例如延迟折扣)中,这两种药物的作用并不一致。在本研究中,AMP 和 ATX 分别在大鼠赌博任务 (rGT) 和延迟折扣中进行了测试,大鼠分别接受了递增或递减延迟时间表的训练。比较了两种药物对冲动行为(过早(PREM)反应)和持续性(PSV)反应的影响,这些反应是在 5 选择和 rGT 任务中测量的。与之前的研究一致,AMP(0.1-1mg/kg)增加了 PREM 和 PSV 反应,ATX(0.5-2mg/kg)降低了 5 选择和 rGT 任务中的这两个指标。在等效剂量下,ATX 对 rGT 或延迟折扣中的选择行为没有可靠影响,这表明该药物对冲动选择和冒险决策没有影响。AMP 的作用更为复杂,在 rGT 中对低风险(P1)选择的偏好略有改变,并且对折扣的影响与强化值无关,而是取决于延迟序列和基线选择偏好。这些结果的一个方面是强调在评估药物对复杂行为(如冲动选择)的影响时,多个方法学因素的重要性,并质疑在哪些最合适的测试条件下检查这些药物对折扣的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验