Department of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University, 1 Nunn Drive, Highland Heights, KY, 41099, USA.
Department of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University, 1 Nunn Drive, Highland Heights, KY, 41099, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 30;376:112228. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112228. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
Procedural modifications can modulate drug effects in delay discounting, such as signaling the delay to reinforcement and altering the order in which delays are presented. Although the schedule of reinforcement can alter the rate at which animals discount a reinforcer, research has not determined if animals trained on different schedules of reinforcement are differentially affected by pharmacological manipulations. Similarly, research has not determined if using different delays to reinforcement can modulate drug effects in delay discounting. Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 36) were split into four groups and were trained in a delay-discounting procedure. The schedule of reinforcement (fixed ratio [FR] 1 vs. FR 10) and delays to reinforcement (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 s vs. 0, 10, 30, 60, 100 s) were manipulated for each group. Following behavioral training, rats were treated with d-amphetamine (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg). Results showed that amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 1 schedule was used, but only when the short delay sequence was used. Conversely, amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 10 schedule was used, but only when rats were trained on the long delay sequence. MK-801 decreased impulsive choice in rats trained on a FR 1 schedule, regardless of delay sequence, but did not alter choice in rats trained on a FR 10 schedule. These results show that schedule of reinforcement and delay length can modulate drug effects in delay discounting.
程序修改可以调节延迟折扣中的药物效应,例如对强化的延迟进行信号通知和改变延迟呈现的顺序。虽然强化的时间表可以改变动物对强化物的折扣率,但研究尚未确定在不同强化时间表上训练的动物是否会受到药物操作的不同影响。同样,研究也尚未确定使用不同的强化延迟是否可以调节延迟折扣中的药物效应。雄性 Sprague Dawley 大鼠(n=36)分为四组,并在延迟折扣程序中进行训练。强化时间表(固定比率 [FR] 1 与 FR 10)和强化延迟(0、5、10、20 和 50 s 与 0、10、30、60、100 s)被分别操纵每个组。在行为训练之后,大鼠接受了 d-苯丙胺(0、0.25、0.5 和 1.0 mg/kg)和 MK-801(0、0.03 和 0.06 mg/kg)的处理。结果表明,当使用 FR 1 时间表时,安非他命降低了冲动选择,但仅在使用短延迟序列时才会出现这种情况。相反,当使用 FR 10 时间表时,安非他命降低了冲动选择,但仅在大鼠接受长延迟序列训练时才会出现这种情况。MK-801 降低了在 FR 1 时间表上训练的大鼠的冲动选择,无论延迟序列如何,但不会改变在 FR 10 时间表上训练的大鼠的选择。这些结果表明,强化时间表和延迟长度可以调节延迟折扣中的药物效应。