NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Sep;16(5):e12378. doi: 10.1111/opn.12378. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
Lack of effective treatments for chronic conditions is associated with high rates of complementary medicine (CM) use. However, little is known about CM use for dementia.
The aim of this study was to explore the experiences, motivations, and attitudes towards CM use by people living with dementia in an Australian setting.
This study had a qualitative research design; quantitative demographic information was also collected.
In-depth interviews were conducted with people living with dementia and their caregivers (N = 18). A thematic (inductive) analysis approach was taken to interpret data.
Three in four participants used CM for dementia, spending ~AUD$100/month (USD$70/month). Within three overarching themes, a range of sub-themes was identified: (1) CM knowledge and use: people living with dementia and caregivers understanding of CM, types of CM used, and CM usage patterns; (2) Self-determined reasons for use/non-use: maintain or improve quality of life, hope, management of dementia symptoms, level of awareness, willingness and evidence, perceptions on efficacy and safety of CM, experiences of conventional medicine, and holistic approach to wellness; (3) External determinants of use: information on CM, relationship influences on CM use, and experiences with General Practitioners (GPs) and CM.
Findings highlight that CM use is widespread and positively viewed by people living with dementia and their caregivers. Decisions regarding CM use were based on personal opinions. Findings have important implications for conversations with health professionals regarding CM use by people living with dementia to improve communication, health literacy, and reduce the risk of adverse effects through polypharmacy.
This study showed that CM is a valued approach for dementia management by people living with dementia, their families, and healthcare providers. Future international research is required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these approaches and promote accurate advice in nursing care.
慢性疾病缺乏有效治疗方法与补充替代医学(CM)的高使用率有关。然而,对于痴呆症患者使用 CM 的情况知之甚少。
本研究旨在探索澳大利亚痴呆症患者使用 CM 的经历、动机和态度。
本研究采用定性研究设计;还收集了定量人口统计学信息。
对 18 名痴呆症患者及其护理人员进行深入访谈。采用主题(归纳)分析方法对数据进行解释。
四分之三的参与者因痴呆症而使用 CM,每月花费约 100 澳元(70 美元)。在三个总体主题下,确定了一系列子主题:(1)CM 知识和使用:痴呆症患者和护理人员对 CM 的理解、使用的 CM 类型和 CM 使用模式;(2)自行决定使用/不使用的原因:维持或改善生活质量、希望、痴呆症症状的管理、意识水平、意愿和证据、对 CM 疗效和安全性的看法、对常规医学的体验以及整体健康方法;(3)使用的外部决定因素:CM 信息、对 CM 使用的关系影响、以及与全科医生(GP)和 CM 的经历。
研究结果表明,CM 的使用广泛且受到痴呆症患者及其护理人员的积极评价。CM 使用决策基于个人意见。这些发现对于与健康专业人员就痴呆症患者使用 CM 进行对话具有重要意义,以改善沟通、健康素养,并通过多药治疗降低不良反应的风险。
本研究表明,CM 是痴呆症患者、其家属和医疗保健提供者管理痴呆症的一种有价值的方法。需要进行未来的国际研究来评估这些方法的疗效和安全性,并在护理中提供准确的建议。