Suppr超能文献

两种治疗退行性下眼睑内翻技术的比较:回顾性研究。

Comparison of the two techniques for involutional lower eyelid entropion: A retrospective study.

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, 06250, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;49(11):1005-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

Abstract

Evaluation of the surgical outcome and the patient satisfaction between the modified Wies technique and the Jones retractor plication technique for involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity. Patients who underwent the modified Wies technique (group 1) and the Jones retractor plication technique (group 2) for correction of involutional lower eyelid entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity between January 2014 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with horizontal eyelid laxity; cicatricial, congenital or iatrogenic entropion; and less than 6 months of follow-up time were excluded. The main outcome measures were the recurrence rate, correct anatomical position of the eyelid, symptom relief, and postoperative complications for both groups. 37 patients (41 eyes) in Group 1 and 34 patients (34 eyes) in Group 2 were enrolled in the study. Mean age ± SD was 75.6 ± 8.5 years in Group 1 and 73.4 ± 7.9 years in Group 2 (p:0.255). The mean follow-up time (range) was 24.3 (6-80) months in group 1 and 25.3 (6-78) months in group 2 (p:0.818). Two patients in Group 1 and seven patients in Group 2 had a recurrence during the follow-up period (p:0.07). Based on the results of the study, it seems that the modified Wies technique may be a good alternative in suitable patients, as it has satisfactory surgical results.

摘要

评价改良 Wies 技术与 Jones 牵开器折叠术治疗无水平眼睑松弛的退行性下眼睑内翻的手术效果和患者满意度。回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,采用改良 Wies 技术(第 1 组)和 Jones 牵开器折叠术(第 2 组)治疗无水平眼睑松弛的退行性下眼睑内翻的患者。排除有水平眼睑松弛、瘢痕性、先天性或医源性内翻以及随访时间少于 6 个月的患者。主要观察指标为两组的复发率、眼睑解剖位置正确、症状缓解和术后并发症。第 1 组 37 例(41 只眼)和第 2 组 34 例(34 只眼)患者纳入研究。第 1 组的平均年龄 ± 标准差为 75.6 ± 8.5 岁,第 2 组为 73.4 ± 7.9 岁(p:0.255)。第 1 组的平均随访时间(范围)为 24.3(6-80)个月,第 2 组为 25.3(6-78)个月(p:0.818)。第 1 组中有 2 例患者和第 2 组中有 7 例患者在随访期间复发(p:0.07)。根据研究结果,改良 Wies 技术似乎是一种适合患者的良好替代方法,因为它具有令人满意的手术效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验