Suppr超能文献

两种修复退行性下睑内翻手术方法的比较研究

A comparative study of two procedures for repair of involutional lower lid entropion.

作者信息

Boboridis K, Bunce C, Rose G E

机构信息

Adnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, England.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2000 May;107(5):959-61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00027-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study compares the use of Jones' retractor plication and the Wies procedure as a primary procedure for the repair of involutional lower lid entropion in the absence of horizontal lid shortening.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series comparison.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred two cases with at least 6 months follow-up after primary surgery for involutional lower lid entropion performed between 1993 and 1996.

INTERVENTIONS

Two groups were compared: Jones' retractor plication was performed in one group and the Wies procedure in the other; neither group had horizontal shortening of the lower eyelid.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rates of cure, recurrence, and overcorrection of the lower lid entropion.

RESULTS

Jones' retractor plication was performed in 37 (36%) patients and the Wies procedure in 65 (64%). Two of the 37 (5%) Jones cases had recurrent entropion develop, both at 31 months after surgery, compared with 1 1 of 65 (17%) recurrences after the Wies procedure (P = 0.81); recurrence after Wies procedure was earlier, at a median of 6 months after surgery. There were 20 of 65 (31 %) overcorrections after the Wies procedure and 4 of 37 (11 %) after the Jones procedure (P < 0.02); one quarter of each group required secondary repair of the overcorrection (5 of 20 after failed Wies procedure; 25% after failed Jones procedure). Overall, there were 6 of 37 (16%) unsatisfactory results after the Jones procedure in contrast to 31 of 65 (48%) after the Wies procedure (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide strong evidence (P < 0.001) that, in the absence of horizontal shortening of the lower eyelid, a successful outcome is more likely after Jones retractor plication than after the Wies procedure.

摘要

目的

本研究比较在无睑水平缩短的情况下,使用琼斯牵开器襞褶术和维斯手术作为退行性下睑内翻修复的主要手术方法的效果。

设计

回顾性病例系列比较。

参与者

1993年至1996年间因退行性下睑内翻接受初次手术后至少随访6个月的102例患者。

干预措施

比较两组:一组行琼斯牵开器襞褶术,另一组行维斯手术;两组均未进行下睑水平缩短。

主要观察指标

下睑内翻的治愈率、复发率和矫正过度率。

结果

37例(36%)患者行琼斯牵开器襞褶术,65例(64%)患者行维斯手术。37例琼斯手术患者中有2例(5%)术后31个月出现复发性内翻,而维斯手术术后65例中有11例(17%)复发(P = 0.81);维斯手术术后复发较早,中位复发时间为术后6个月。维斯手术术后有20例(31%)矫正过度,琼斯手术术后有4例(11%)矫正过度(P < 0.02);每组有四分之一的患者需要对矫正过度进行二次修复(维斯手术失败后20例中有5例;琼斯手术失败后25%)。总体而言,琼斯手术术后37例中有6例(16%)结果不满意,而维斯手术术后65例中有31例(48%)结果不满意(P < 0.001)。

结论

这些数据提供了有力证据(P < 0.001),即在无下睑水平缩短的情况下,琼斯牵开器襞褶术比维斯手术更有可能获得成功的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验